Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31844092›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2019

The pitfalls of biodiversity proxies: Differences in richness patterns of birds, trees and understudied diversity across Amazonia.

Camila D Ritter, Søren Faurby, Dominic J Bennett, Luciano N Naka, Hans Ter Steege, Alexander Zizka, Quiterie Haenel, R Henrik Nilsson, Alexandre Antonelli

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Landscape dynamics and diversification of the megadiverse South American freshwater fish fauna.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2023
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Camila D RitterDepartment of Eukaryotic Microbiology, University of Duisburg-Essen, Universitätsstrasse 5 S05 R04 H83, D-45141, Essen, Germany. kmicaduarte@gmail.com.
Søren FaurbyGothenburg Global Biodiversity Centre, Box 461, SE-405 30, Göteborg, Sweden.
Dominic J BennettGothenburg Global Biodiversity Centre, Box 461, SE-405 30, Göteborg, Sweden.
Luciano N NakaLaboratório de Ornitologia, Departamento de Zoologia, Universidade Federal de Pernambuco, Recife, PE, Brazil.
Hans Ter SteegeNaturalis Biodiversity Center, Leiden, Netherlands.
Alexander ZizkaGerman Centre for Integrative Biodiversity Research (iDiv) Halle-Jena-Leipzig, Deutscher Platz 5e, 04103, Leipzig, Germany.
Quiterie HaenelZoological Institute, University of Basel, Vesalgasse 1, CH-4051, Basel, Switzerland.
R Henrik NilssonGothenburg Global Biodiversity Centre, Box 461, SE-405 30, Göteborg, Sweden.
Alexandre AntonelliGothenburg Global Biodiversity Centre, Box 461, SE-405 30, Göteborg, Sweden.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Most knowledge on biodiversity derives from the study of charismatic macro-organisms, such as birds and trees. However, the diversity of micro-organisms constitutes the majority of all life forms on Earth. Here, we ask if the patterns of richness inferred for macro-organisms are similar for micro-organisms. For this, we barcoded samples of soil, litter and insects from four localities on a west-to-east transect across Amazonia. We quantified richness as Operational Taxonomic Units (OTUs) in those samples using three molecular markers. We then compared OTU richness with species richness of two relatively well-studied organism groups in Amazonia: trees and birds. We find that OTU richness shows a declining west-to-east diversity gradient that is in agreement with the species richness patterns documented here and previously for birds and trees. These results suggest that most taxonomic groups respond to the same overall diversity gradients at large spatial scales. However, our results show a different pattern of richness in relation to habitat types, suggesting that the idiosyncrasies of each taxonomic group and peculiarities of the local environment frequently override large-scale diversity gradients. Our findings caution against using the diversity distribution of one taxonomic group as an indication of patterns of richness across all groups.

Indexed as

AnimalsBiodiversityBirdsEcosystemGeographyInsectaTrees

Identifiers

PMID31844092
PMCPMC6915760

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.