Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31844078›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2019

Adherence to guideline recommendations for coronary angiography in a poor South-East Asian setting: Impact on short- and medium-term clinical outcomes.

Andriany Qanitha, Cuno S P M Uiterwaal, Jose P S Henriques, Idar Mappangara, Muzakkir Amir, Sumarsono G Saing, Bastianus A J M de Mol

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 26% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Andriany QanithaDepartment of Cardio-thoracic Surgery, AMC Heart Center, Amsterdam University Medical Center, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands. myaqanitha@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2420-0560
Cuno S P M UiterwaalJulius Global Health, Julius Center for Health Sciences and Primary Care, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Jose P S HenriquesDepartment of Cardiology, AMC Heart Center, Amsterdam University Medical Center, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Idar MappangaraDepartment of Cardiology and Vascular Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Hasanuddin University, Makassar, Indonesia.
Muzakkir AmirDepartment of Cardiology and Vascular Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Hasanuddin University, Makassar, Indonesia.
Sumarsono G SaingMakassar Cardiac Center, Catheterization Laboratory Unit, DR. Wahidin Sudirohusodo Hospital, Makassar, Indonesia.
Bastianus A J M de MolDepartment of Cardio-thoracic Surgery, AMC Heart Center, Amsterdam University Medical Center, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Amsterdam University Medical Centers · NLHasanuddin University · IDUniversity of Amsterdam · NLUtrecht University · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In South-East Asian populations and particularly in Indonesia, access to coronary angiography (CAG) is limited. We aimed to assess the adherence for undergoing CAG for indicated patients, according to the guideline recommendations. We then examined whether this adherence would have an impact on patients' short- and medium-term mortality and morbidity. We consecutively enrolled 474 patients with acute and stable coronary artery disease who had indication for CAG at Makassar Cardiac Center, Indonesia from February 2013 to December 2014. We found that adherence to CAG recommendation in poor South-East Asian setting is low. Of 474 recommended patients, only 273 (57.6%) underwent the procedure. Factors for not undergoing CAG were: older age, female gender, low educational and socio-economic status, and insurance type. While reasons for patients refusing CAG and subsequent intervention included fear, symptoms reduction, and lack of trust concerning the procedure benefit. During follow-up (median 19 (IQR 6-39.3) months), 155 (32.7%) patients died, and 259 (54.6%) experienced at least one adverse event. Adherence to CAG recommendation was associated with a significantly lower short- and medium-term mortality, independent of revascularization and other potential confounders. In sub-group analysis, adhered patients "with revascularization" had significantly better outcomes compared to the "non-revascularization" and "not adhere" groups.

Indexed as

Coronary AngiographyGuideline AdherencePovertyFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHumansIndonesiaKaplan-Meier EstimateMaleMiddle AgedPercutaneous Coronary InterventionProportional Hazards ModelsTime FactorsTreatment Outcome

Identifiers

PMID31844078
PMCPMC6915772
OpenAlexW2996410840

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.