ArticleCold Spring Harbor perspectives in biology2020
Next-Generation Biomaterials for Culture and Manipulation of Stem Cells.
Article in Cold Spring Harbor perspectives in biology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed.
- Stimuli-Responsive Substrates to Control the Immunomodulatory Potential of Stromal Cells.Biomacromolecules · 2024Review
- Impact of coverage and guest residue on polyproline II helix peptide antifouling.MRS communications · 2024Article
- Implications of Cellular Mechanical Memory in Bioengineering.ACS biomaterials science & engineering · 2023Review
- Engineering Materials and Devices for the Prevention, Diagnosis, and Treatment of COVID-19 and Infectious Diseases.Nanomaterials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Review
- Carboxymethyl Chitosan and Gelatin Hydrogel Scaffolds Incorporated with Conductive PEDOT Nanoparticles for Improved Neural Stem Cell Proliferation and Neuronal Differentiation.Molecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Article
- Biomaterials to enhance stem cell transplantation.Cell stem cell · 2022Review
- Quantitative developmental biology in vitro using micropatterning.Development (Cambridge, England) · 2021Review
- Neural crest-like stem cells for tissue regeneration.Stem cells translational medicine · 2021Review
- Stimuli-Responsive Biomaterials: Scaffolds for Stem Cell Control.Advanced healthcare materials · 2021Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Stem cell fate decisions are informed by physical and chemical cues presented within and by the extracellular matrix. Despite the generally attributed importance of extracellular cues in governing self-renewal, differentiation, and collective behavior, knowledge gaps persist with regard to the individual, synergistic, and competing effects that specific physiochemical signals have on cell function. To better understand basic stem cell biology, as well as to expand opportunities in regenerative medicine and tissue engineering, a growing suite of customizable biomaterials has been developed. These next-generation cell culture materials offer user-defined biochemical and biomechanical properties, increasingly in a manner that can be controlled in time and 3D space. This review highlights recent innovations in this regard, focusing on advances to culture and maintain stemness, direct fate, and to detect stem cell function using biomaterial-based strategies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.