Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31843837›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2019

Barriers and facilitators to buprenorphine use for opioid agonist treatment: protocol for a scoping review.

Pamela Leece, Triti Khorasheh, Kimberly Corace, Carol Strike, Ahmed M Bayoumi, Sheena Taha, Elisabeth Marks, Beata Pach, Keith Ahamad, Erin Grennell and 3 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 22% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 7 institutions in 1 country.

Pamela LeeceHealth Promotion, Chronic Disease and Injury Prevention, Public Health Ontario, Toronto, Ontario, Canada Pamela.leece@oahpp.ca.ORCID 0000-0001-8374-6518
Triti KhorashehHealth Promotion, Chronic Disease and Injury Prevention, Public Health Ontario, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Kimberly CoraceDepartment of Psychiatry, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada.
Carol StrikeDalla Lana School of Public Health, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Ahmed M BayoumiMAP Centre for Urban Health Solutions, Li Ka Shing Knowledge Institute, St. Michael's Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Sheena TahaCanadian Centre on Substance Use and Addiction, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada.
Elisabeth MarksKnowledge Services, Public Health Ontario, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Beata PachKnowledge Services, Public Health Ontario, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Keith AhamadBritish Columbia Centre on Substance Use, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.
Erin GrennellDepartment of Public Health Sciences, Queen's University, Kingston, Ontario, Canada.
Melissa HolowatyDepartment of Family Medicine, Queen's University, Kingston, Ontario, Canada.
Heather MansonHealth Promotion, Chronic Disease and Injury Prevention, Public Health Ontario, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Sharon E StrausLi Ka Shing Knowledge Institute, St. Michael's Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Public Health Ontario · CAQueen's University · CASt. Michael's Hospital · CABritish Columbia Centre on Substance Use · CACanadian Centre on Substance Use and Addiction · CAUniversity of Ottawa · CAUniversity of Toronto · CA

Funding

CIHR 162063
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionIn the context of the opioid crisis in North America, the benefits of evidence-based opioid agonist treatments such as buprenorphine/naloxone have not been optimised due to low uptake. Numerous factors contribute to the underuse of buprenorphine, and theory-informed approaches to identify and address implementation barriers and facilitators are needed. This scoping review aims to characterise the barriers and facilitators at the patient, healthcare professional, organisation and system level according to the Theoretical Domains Framework (TDF), and identify gaps to inform practice and policy. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: We will conduct a scoping review using established methods and follow the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses extension for scoping reviews. We will identify English and French-language peer-reviewed literature by searching five electronic bibliographic databases (MEDLINE, Embase, PsychINFO, CINAHL, and SocINDEX), from inception and use Google, websites of key organisations, and two or more custom search engines to identify relevant grey literature. Eligible records will be quantitative or qualitative studies that examine barriers and facilitators to buprenorphine use at the patient, healthcare professional, organisation and system level, and involve participants with diagnosis of opioid use disorder or professionals involved in their care. Two reviewers will be involved in independently screening, reviewing and charting the data and calibration exercises will be conducted at each stage. We will conduct descriptive analysis for the charted data, and deductively code barriers and facilitators using the TDF. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: As a scoping review of the literature, this study does not require ethics approval. Our dissemination strategy will focus on developing tailored activities to meet the needs of diverse knowledge user audiences. Barriers and facilitators mapped to the TDF can be linked to evidence-based strategies for change to improve buprenorphine use and access, and enable practice to reduce opioid-related harms.

Indexed as

Opiate Substitution TreatmentAnalgesics, OpioidBuprenorphineHumansOpioid-Related DisordersPractice Patterns, Physicians'Primary Health CareResearch DesignScoping Reviews as TopicAnalgesics, OpioidBuprenorphinebuprenorphineHealth services administration & managementopioid agonist treatmentpublic healthscoping reviewSubstance misuse

Identifiers

PMID31843837
PMCPMC6924699
OpenAlexW2995579905

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.