Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31843558›Full record

ReviewIndian pacing and electrophysiology journal

Fragmented QRS - Its significance.

R N Supreeth, Johnson Francis

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Indian pacing and electrophysiology journal. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.1field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 36 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Fragmented QRS is associated with ventricular arrhythmias in heart failure patients: A systematic review and meta-analysis.Annals of noninvasive electrocardiology : the official journal of the International Society for Holter and Noninvasive Electrocardiology, Inc · 2022
    Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. The Fragmented QRS Complex in Lead VJournal of cardiovascular translational research · 2024
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Significance of fragmented QRS and predictors of outcome in ST-elevation myocardial infarction.Journal of research in medical sciences : the official journal of Isfahan University of Medical Sciences · 2024
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Observational
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

R N SupreethBaby Memorial Hospital, Kozhikode, Kerala, India.
Johnson FrancisBaby Memorial Hospital, Kozhikode, Kerala, India. Electronic address: pulikkottil2002@hotmail.com.
Baby Memorial Hospital · IN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Fragment QRS (fQRS) complex is a myocardial conduction abnormality that indicates myocardial scar. It is defined as additional notches in the QRS complex. Though initially fQRS was defined in the setting of normal QRS duration (<120 m s), later it has been expanded to include conditions with wide QRS complexes as in bundle branch block, ventricular ectopy and paced rhythm, when more than 2 notches are present. It is an important, yet often overlooked marker of mortality and arrhythmic events in many cardiac diseases. The significance of fQRS lies in the fact that it just requires a surface ECG for its recording and the value of information about the condition of the heart it dispenses based on the clinical setting. We review the role of fQRS in predicting adverse cardiac events in various conditions.

Indexed as

Acute myocardial infarctionAdverse cardiac eventsCardiac arrhythmiasCardiomyopathyfQRSFragmented QRSHeart failureMyocardial scar

Identifiers

PMID31843558
PMCPMC6994396
OpenAlexW2998147746

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.