Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31843544›Full record

ReviewNeuroscience and biobehavioral reviews2020

A neuroscientist's guide to transgenic mice and other genetic tools.

Shaghayegh Navabpour, Janine L Kwapis, Timothy J Jarome

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Neuroscience and biobehavioral reviews, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 61 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
61citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

61 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. A Nerve-Fibroblast Axis in Mammalian Lung Fibrosis.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025
    Article
  16. Journal of animal science and technology · 2025
    Article
  17. Article
  18. eLemur: A cellular-resolution 3D atlas of the mouse lemur brain.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2024
    Article
  19. Astrocytes and Tinnitus.Brain sciences · 2024
    Review
  20. An arginine-rich nuclear localization signal (ArgiNLS) strategy for streamlined image segmentation of single cells.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2024
    Article

1 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Shaghayegh NavabpourFralin Biomedical Research Institute, Translational Biology, Medicine and Health, Roanoke, VA, USA.
Janine L KwapisDepartment of Biology, Pennsylvania State University, College Park, PA, USA; Center for the Molecular Investigation of Neurological Disorders (CMIND), Pennsylvania State University, College Park, PA, USA. Electronic address: jlk855@psu.edu.
Timothy J JaromeFralin Biomedical Research Institute, Translational Biology, Medicine and Health, Roanoke, VA, USA; Department of Animal and Poultry Sciences, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, Blacksburg, VA, USA; School of Neuroscience, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, Blacksburg, VA, USA. Electronic address: tjjarome@vt.edu.

Funding

Epigenetic regulation of the circadian gene Per1 in age-related memory impairmentsR00AG056596 · NIA · PENNSYLVANIA STATE UNIVERSITY, THE · PI KWAPIS, JANINE LYNN · 2019 to 2021
$747k
Epigenetic regulation of the circadian gene Per1 in age-related memory impairmentsK99AG056596 · NIA · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA-IRVINE · PI KWAPIS, JANINE LYNN · 2017 to 2018
$201k
NIA NIH HHS K99 AG056596NIA NIH HHS R00 AG056596
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The past decade has produced an explosion in the number and variety of genetic tools available to neuroscientists, resulting in an unprecedented ability to precisely manipulate the genome and epigenome in behaving animals. However, no single resource exists that describes all of the tools available to neuroscientists. Here, we review the genetic, transgenic, and viral techniques that are currently available to probe the complex relationship between genes and cognition. Topics covered include types of traditional transgenic mouse models (knockout, knock-in, reporter lines), inducible systems (Cre-loxP, Tet-On, Tet-Off) and cell- and circuit-specific systems (TetTag, TRAP, DIO-DREADD). Additionally, we provide details on virus-mediated and siRNA/shRNA approaches, as well as a comprehensive discussion of the myriad manipulations that can be made using the CRISPR-Cas9 system, including single base pair editing and spatially- and temporally-regulated gene-specific transcriptional control. Collectively, this review will serve as a guide to assist neuroscientists in identifying and choosing the appropriate genetic tools available to study the complex relationship between the brain and behavior.

Indexed as

CRISPR-Cas SystemsGenetic TechniquesGenetic VectorsMice, TransgenicAnimalsMiceNeurosciencesBehaviorBrainCreCRISPRDREADDsKnockoutsTransgenic mice

Identifiers

PMID31843544
PMCPMC8049509

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.