Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31843507›Full record

ReviewJornal de pediatria

Septic shock in pediatrics: the state-of-the-art.

Pedro Celiny Ramos Garcia, Cristian Tedesco Tonial, Jefferson Pedro Piva

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Jornal de pediatria. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.9field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 49 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Establishing the international research priorities for pediatric emergency medicine point-of-care ultrasound: A modified Delphi study.Academic emergency medicine : official journal of the Society for Academic Emergency Medicine · 2022
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Detection of atrial fibrosis using echocardiographic strain: a new pathway.Revista da Associacao Medica Brasileira (1992) · 2022
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Pedro Celiny Ramos GarciaPontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio Grande do Sul (PUCRS), Hospital São Lucas, Faculdade de Medicina e Terapia Intensiva Pediátrica, Programa de Pós-Graduação em Pediatria e Saúde Infantil, Porto Alegre, RS, Brazil.
Cristian Tedesco TonialPontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio Grande do Sul (PUCRS), Hospital São Lucas, Faculdade de Medicina e Terapia Intensiva Pediátrica, Departamento de Pediatria, Porto Alegre, RS, Brazil. Electronic address: cristian.tonial@pucrs.br.
Jefferson Pedro PivaUniversidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (UFRGS), Faculdade de Medicina, Porto Alegre, RS, Brazil; Hospital de Clínicas de Porto Alegre, Departamento de Emergência e Cuidados Intensivos Pediátricos, Porto Alegre, RS, Brazil.
Hospital São Lucas da PUCRS · BRPontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio Grande do Sul · BRUniversidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul · BR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveReview the main aspects of the definition, diagnosis, and management of pediatric patients with sepsis and septic shock. SOURCE OF DATA: A search was carried out in the MEDLINE and Embase databases. The articles were chosen according to the authors' interest, prioritizing those published in the last five years. SYNTHESIS OF DATA: Sepsis remains a major cause of mortality in pediatric patients. The variability of clinical presentations makes it difficult to attain a precise definition in pediatrics. Airway stabilization with adequate oxygenation and ventilation if necessary, initial volume resuscitation, antibiotic administration, and cardiovascular support are the basis of sepsis treatment. In resource-poor settings, attention should be paid to the risks of fluid overload when administrating fluids. Administration of vasoactive drugs such as epinephrine or norepinephrine is necessary in the absence of volume response within the first hour. Follow-up of shock treatment should adhere to targets such as restoring vital and clinical signs of shock and controlling the focus of infection. A multimodal evaluation with bedside ultrasound for management after the first hours is recommended. In refractory shock, attention should be given to situations such as cardiac tamponade, hypothyroidism, adrenal insufficiency, abdominal catastrophe, and focus of uncontrolled infection.

conclusionsThe implementation of protocols and advanced technologies have reduced sepsis mortality. In resource-poor settings, good practices such as early sepsis identification, antibiotic administration, and careful fluid infusion are the cornerstones of sepsis management.

Indexed as

Shock, SepticAnti-Bacterial AgentsChildFluid TherapyHumansPediatricsResuscitationAnti-Bacterial AgentsChildChoqueCriançaInfecçãoInfectionIntensive Care UnitsMortalidadeMortalitySepseSepsisShockUnidade de Cuidados Intensivos

Identifiers

PMID31843507
PMCPMC9432279
OpenAlexW2996299824

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.