ArticleBiochemical and biophysical research communications2020
Identification of a distinct desensitisation gate in the ATP-gated P2X2 receptor.
Article in Biochemical and biophysical research communications, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.
- Comprehensive insights into potential roles of purinergic P2 receptors on diseases: Signaling pathways involved and potential therapeutics.Journal of advanced research · 2025Review
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
P2X receptors are trimeric ATP-gated ion channels. In response to ATP binding, conformational changes lead to opening of the channel and ion flow. Current flow can decline during continued ATP binding in a process called desensitisation. The rate and extent of desensitisation is affected by multiple factors, for instance the T18A mutation in P2X2 makes the ion channel fast desensitising. We have used this mutation to investigate whether the gate restricting ion flow is different in the desensitised and the closed state, by combining molecular modelling and cysteine modification using MTSET (2-(Trimethylammonium)ethyl methanethiosulfonate). Homology modelling of the P2X2 receptor and negative space imaging of the channel suggested a movement of the restriction gate with residue T335 being solvent accessible in the desensitised, but not the closed state. This was confirmed experimentally by probing the accessibility of T335C in the P2X2 T18A/T335C (fast desensitisation) and T335C (slow desensitisation) mutants with MTSET which demonstrates that the barrier to ion flow is different in the closed and the desensitised states. To investigate the T18A induced switch in desensitisation we compared molecular dynamics simulations of the wild type and T18A P2X2 receptor which suggest that the differences in time course of desensitisation are due to structural destabilization of a hydrogen bond network of conserved residues in the proximity of T18.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.