Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31842946›Full record

ReviewHuman resources for health2019

Remote health workforce turnover and retention: what are the policy and practice priorities?

John Wakerman, John Humphreys, Deborah Russell, Steven Guthridge, Lisa Bourke, Terry Dunbar, Yuejen Zhao, Mark Ramjan, Lorna Murakami-Gold, Michael P Jones

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Human resources for health, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 108 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
108citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
31.0field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

108 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 220 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Designing Mentorship for Constrained Systems: Reframing Workforce Development in Rural and Remote Health.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2026
    Article
  9. Observational
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Digital Health Innovation by Design: A Logic Model Scaffold for Rural, Regional, and Remote Settings.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2025
    Article

48 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 9 institutions in 1 country.

John WakermanMenzies School of Health Research, Centre for Remote Health, CNR Simpson and Skinner Streets, Postal: PO Box 4066, Alice Springs, NT 0871, Australia. John.wakerman@menzies.edu.au.ORCID 0000-0002-8546-5434
John HumphreysMonash University School of Rural Health, PO Box 91, Strathdale, VIC, 3550, Australia.
Deborah RussellMenzies School of Health Research, Centre for Remote Health, CNR Simpson and Skinner Streets, Postal: PO Box 4066, Alice Springs, NT 0871, Australia.
Steven GuthridgeCentre for Child Development and Education, Menzies School of Health Research, Building Red 9, Charles Darwin University, Casuarina campus, Ellengowan Drive, Postal: PO Box 41096, Casuarina, NT, 0811, Australia.
Lisa BourkeUniversity Department of Rural Health, The University of Melbourne, PO Box 6500, Shepparton, VIC, 3632, Australia.
Terry DunbarIndigenous Social and Wellbeing Centre, School of Population Health Research, Australian National University, Canberra, Australia.
Yuejen ZhaoNorthern Territory Department of Health, 87 Mitchell Street, Darwin, NT, 0800, Australia.
Mark RamjanTop End Health Service, Northern Territory Government, GPO Box 40596, Area 2C Casuarina Plaza, Casuarina, NT, 0810, Australia.
Lorna Murakami-GoldPoche Centre for Indigenous Health & Well-Being, Flinders NT, Rubuntja Building - Alice Springs Hospital, PO Box 2234, Alice Springs, NT, 0871, Australia.
Michael P JonesPsychology Department, Macquarie University, North Ryde, NSW, 2109, Australia.
Menzies School of Health Research · AUAlice Springs Hospital · AUAustralian National University · AUCharles Darwin University · AUGovernment of the Northern Territory · AUMacquarie University · AUMonash University · AUNorthern Territory Health Services · AUThe University of Melbourne · AU

Funding

Discovery Project Australian Research Council DP150102227
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundResidents of remote communities in Australia and other geographically large countries have comparatively poorer access to high-quality primary health care. To inform ongoing policy development and practice in relation to remote area health service delivery, particularly in remote Indigenous communities, this review synthesizes the key findings of (1) a comprehensive study of workforce turnover and retention in remote Northern Territory (NT) of Australia and (2) a narrative review of relevant international literature on remote and rural health workforce retention strategies. This synthesis provides a valuable summary of the current state of international knowledge about improving remote health workforce retention. MAIN TEXT: Annual turnover rates of NT remote area nurses (148%) and Aboriginal health practitioners (80%) are very high and 12-month stability rates low (48% and 76%, respectively). In remote NT, use of agency nurses has increased substantially. Primary care costs are high and proportional to staff turnover and remoteness. Effectiveness of care decreases with higher turnover and use of short-term staff, such that higher staff turnover is always less cost-effective. If staff turnover in remote clinics were halved, the potential savings would be approximately A$32 million per annum. Staff turnover and retention were affected by management style and effectiveness, and employment of Indigenous staff. Review of the international literature reveals three broad themes: Targeted enrolment into training and appropriate education designed to produce a competent, accessible, acceptable and 'fit-for-purpose' workforce; addressing broader health system issues that ensure a safe and supportive work environment; and providing ongoing individual and family support. Key educational initiatives include prioritising remote origin and Indigenous students for university entry; maximising training in remote areas; contextualising curricula; providing financial, pedagogical and pastoral support; and ensuring clear, supported career pathways and continuing professional development. Health system initiatives include ensuring adequate funding; providing adequate infrastructure including fit-for-purpose clinics, housing, transport and information technology; offering flexible employment arrangements whilst ensuring a good 'fit' between individual staff and the community (especially with regard to cultural skills); optimising co-ordination and management of services that empower staff and create positive practice environments; and prioritising community participation and employment of locals. Individual and family supports include offering tailored financial incentives, psychological support and 'time out'.

conclusionOptimal remote health workforce stability and preventing excessive 'avoidable' turnover mandates alignment of government and health authority policies with both health service requirements and individual health professional and community needs. Supportive underpinning policies include: Strong intersectoral collaboration between the health and education sectors to ensure a fit-for-purpose workforce;A funding policy which mandates the development and implementation of an equitable, needs-based formula for funding remote health services;Policies that facilitate transition to community control, prioritise Indigenous training and employment, and mandate a culturally safe work context; andAn employment policy which provides flexibility of employment conditions in order to be able to offer individually customised retention packages There is considerable extant evidence from around the world about effective retention strategies that contribute to slowing excessive remote health workforce turnover, resulting in significant cost savings and improved continuity of care. The immediate problem comprises an 'implementation gap' in translating empirical research evidence into actions designed to resolve existing problems. If we wish to ameliorate the very high turnover of staff in remote areas, in order to provide an equitable service to populations with arguably the highest health needs, we need political and executive commitment to get the policy settings right and ensure the coordinated implementation of multiple strategies, including better linking existing strategies and 'filling the gaps' where necessary.

Indexed as

AustraliaHealth Services, IndigenousHealth WorkforceHumansPersonnel TurnoverRural Health ServicesRural Population

Identifiers

PMID31842946
PMCPMC6915930
OpenAlexW2995976981

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.