Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31842929›Full record

SynthesisCritical care (London, England)2019

The impact of intensive care unit diaries on patients' and relatives' outcomes: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Bruna Brandao Barreto, Mariana Luz, Marcos Nogueira de Oliveira Rios, Antonio Alberto Lopes, Dimitri Gusmao-Flores

Open access · goldAbstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Critical care (London, England), 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 51 papers, 5 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
51citing papers in PubMed, 5 pooled it
10.4field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

51 citing papers in PubMed, 5 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 153 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Trial
  9. Trial
  10. Trial
  11. Trial
  12. Trial
  13. Trial
  14. Trial
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Bruna Brandao BarretoIntensive Care Unit, Hospital da Mulher, Rua Barão de Cotegipe, 1153, Roma, Salvador, Bahia, 40411-900, Brazil. brunab_barreto@yahoo.com.br.ORCID 0000-0002-8670-3270
Mariana LuzIntensive Care Unit, Hospital da Mulher, Rua Barão de Cotegipe, 1153, Roma, Salvador, Bahia, 40411-900, Brazil.
Marcos Nogueira de Oliveira RiosIntensive Care Unit, Hospital da Mulher, Rua Barão de Cotegipe, 1153, Roma, Salvador, Bahia, 40411-900, Brazil.
Antonio Alberto LopesNúcleo de Epidemiologia Clínica e Medicina Baseada em Evidências, Hospital Universitário Professor Edgard Santos, Universidade Federal da Bahia, Salvador, Brazil.
Dimitri Gusmao-FloresIntensive Care Unit, Hospital da Mulher, Rua Barão de Cotegipe, 1153, Roma, Salvador, Bahia, 40411-900, Brazil.
Universidade Federal da Bahia · BRHospital São Rafael · BR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundMemory gaps in intensive care unit (ICU) survivors are associated with psychiatric disorders. The ICU diaries improve the patient's factual memory of the ICU, but it is not clear if they reduce the incidence of psychiatric disorders in patients and relatives after hospital discharge. The aim of this study is to evaluate the literature on the effect of ICU diaries for patients admitted in ICU and their relatives.

methodsTwo authors independently searched the online databases PubMed, OVID, Embase, EBSCO host, and PsycINFO from inception to July 2019. Studies were included if the intervention group (ICU diary) was compared with a group with no diaries and the sample was comprised patients ≥ 18 years old admitted in the ICU for more than 24 h and their relatives. Randomized clinical trials, observational studies, letter with original data, and abstracts were included, irrespective of the language. The search was not limited by any specific outcome. Review articles, commentaries, editorials, and studies without a control group were excluded. Structured tools were used to assess the methodological quality ("Risk Of Bias In Non-randomized Studies of Interventions (ROBINS-I)" for cohort studies and the "Cochrane Risk of Bias tool" for included RCTs and before/after studies). A random-effects model was employed considering the anticipated variability between the studies.

resultsSeven hundred eighty-five titles were identified for screening. Two additional studies were selected after a reference search, and after a full-text review, a total of 12 studies were included. When pooling the results, ICU diary was associated with lower risk of depression (RR 0.41, 95% CI 0.23-0.75) and better quality of life (10.3 points higher in SF-36 general health score, 95% CI 0.79-19.8), without a decrease in anxiety or post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD). For the relatives receiving an ICU diary, there was no difference in the incidence of PTSD, anxiety, or depression. CONCLUSION AND RELEVANCE: This systematic review and meta-analysis supports the use of ICU diaries to reduce the risk of depression and preserve the quality of life of patients after ICU admission. ICU diaries do not seem to have any beneficial effect on the relatives of the patients.

trial registrationPROSPERO, CRD42019136639.

Indexed as

Diaries as TopicCritical IllnessFamilyHumansIntensive Care UnitsMemory DisordersOutcome Assessment, Health CarePatientsStress Disorders, Post-TraumaticSurvivorsAnxietyDepressionICU diaryPost-traumatic stress disorderQuality of life

Identifiers

PMID31842929
PMCPMC6916011
OpenAlexW2994618443

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.