Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31842872›Full record

ArticleMalaria journal2019

Producing routine malaria data: an exploration of the micro-practices and processes shaping routine malaria data quality in frontline health facilities in Kenya.

George Okello, Sassy Molyneux, Scholastica Zakayo, Rene Gerrets, Caroline Jones

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Malaria journal, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed
12.0field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 42 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Observational
  3. Characterization of Malaria Outbreak in Marsabit County, Kenya, March 2024.The American journal of tropical medicine and hygiene · 2025
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 3 countries.

George OkelloKenya Medical Research Institute-Wellcome Trust Research Programme, P.O Box 230, 80108, Kilifi, Kenya. gokello@kemri-wellcome.org.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6263-1858
Sassy MolyneuxKenya Medical Research Institute-Wellcome Trust Research Programme, P.O Box 230, 80108, Kilifi, Kenya.
Scholastica ZakayoKenya Medical Research Institute-Wellcome Trust Research Programme, P.O Box 230, 80108, Kilifi, Kenya.
Rene GerretsDepartment of Anthropology, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Caroline JonesKenya Medical Research Institute-Wellcome Trust Research Programme, P.O Box 230, 80108, Kilifi, Kenya.
Kenya Medical Research Institute · KEUniversity of Amsterdam · NL

Funding

Wellcome TrustWellcome Trust 101085/Z/13/Z
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundRoutine health information systems can provide near real-time data for malaria programme management, monitoring and evaluation, and surveillance. There are widespread concerns about the quality of the malaria data generated through routine information systems in many low-income countries. However, there has been little careful examination of micro-level practices of data collection which are central to the production of routine malaria data.

methodsDrawing on fieldwork conducted in two malaria endemic sub-counties in Kenya, this study examined the processes and practices that shape routine malaria data generation at frontline health facilities. The study employed ethnographic methods-including observations, records review, and interviews-over 18-months in four frontline health facilities and two sub-county health records offices. Data were analysed using a thematic analysis approach.

resultsMalaria data generation was influenced by a range of factors including human resource shortages, tool design, and stock-out of data collection tools. Most of the challenges encountered by health workers in routine malaria data generation had their roots in wider system issues and at the national level where the framing of indicators and development of data collection tools takes place. In response to these challenges, health workers adopted various coping mechanisms such as informal task shifting and use of improvised tools. While these initiatives sustained the data collection process, they also had considerable implications for the data recorded and led to discrepancies in data that were recorded in primary registers. These discrepancies were concealed in aggregated monthly reports that were subsequently entered into the District Health Information Software 2.

conclusionChallenges to routine malaria data generation at frontline health facilities are not malaria or health information systems specific; they reflect wider health system weaknesses. Any interventions seeking to improve routine malaria data generation must look beyond just malaria or health information system initiatives and include consideration of the broader contextual factors that shape malaria data generation.

Indexed as

Data AccuracyData CollectionData Interpretation, StatisticalEpidemiological MonitoringHealth FacilitiesHealth Information SystemsHumansKenyaMalariaHealth information systemMalaria surveillanceRoutine data

Identifiers

PMID31842872
PMCPMC6915927
OpenAlexW2996128966

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.