Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31842846›Full record

ArticleBMC public health2019

Household-focused interventions to enhance the treatment and management of HIV in low- and middle-income countries: a scoping review.

Ferdinand C Mukumbang, Lucia Knight, Caroline Masquillier, Anton Delport, Neo Sematlane, Lorraine Tanyaradzwa Dube, Martina Lembani, Edwin Wouters

Abstract readScoping Review
In one paragraph

Article in BMC public health, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Psychosocial support for HIV serodiscordant couples.Health psychology and behavioral medicine · 2022
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Ferdinand C MukumbangSchool of Public Health, University of the Western Cape, Cape Town, South Africa. mukumbang@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1441-2172
Lucia KnightSchool of Public Health, University of the Western Cape, Cape Town, South Africa.
Caroline MasquillierDepartment of Social Sciences, Antwerp University, Antwerp, Belgium.
Anton DelportSchool of Public Health, University of the Western Cape, Cape Town, South Africa.
Neo SematlaneSchool of Public Health, University of the Western Cape, Cape Town, South Africa.
Lorraine Tanyaradzwa DubeSchool of Public Health, University of the Western Cape, Cape Town, South Africa.
Martina LembaniSchool of Public Health, University of the Western Cape, Cape Town, South Africa.
Edwin WoutersDepartment of Social Sciences, Antwerp University, Antwerp, Belgium.

Funding

Belgian Development Cooperation Grant ZA2018TEA474A102National Research Foundation of South Africa Grant No 98918Research Foundation - Flanders FWO - G035018N
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundHIV remains a major public health challenge in many low- and middle-income countries (LMICs). The initiation of a greater number of people living with HIV (PLHIV) onto antiretroviral therapy (ART) following the World Health Organization's 'universal test and treat' recommendation has the potential to overstretch already challenged health systems in LMICs. While various mainstream and community-based care models have been implemented to improve the treatment outcomes of PLHIV, little effort has been made to harness the potential of the families or households of PLHIV to enhance their treatment outcomes. To this end, we sought to explore the characteristics and effectiveness of household-focused interventions in LMICs on the management of HIV as measured by levels of adherence, viral suppression and different dimensions of HIV competence. Additionally, we sought to explore the mechanisms of change to explain how the interventions achieved the expected outcomes.

methodsWe systematically reviewed the literature published from 2003 to 2018, obtained from six electronic databases. We thematically analysed the 11 selected articles guided by the population, intervention, comparison and outcome (PICO) framework. Following the generative causality logic, whereby mechanisms are postulated to mediate an intervention and the outcomes, we applied a mechanism-based inferential reasoning, retroduction, to identify the mechanisms underlying the interventions to understand how these interventions are expected to work.

resultsThe identified HIV-related interventions with a household focus were multi-component and multi-dimensional, incorporating aspects of information sharing on HIV; improving communication; stimulating social support and promoting mental health. Most of the interventions sought to empower and stimulate self-efficacy while strengthening the perceived social support of the PLHIV. Studies reported a significant positive impact on improving various aspects of HIV competent household - positive effects on HIV knowledge, communication between household members, and improved mental health outcomes of youths living in HIV-affected households.

conclusionBy aiming to strengthen the perceived social support and self-efficacy of PLHIV, household-focused HIV interventions can address various aspects of household HIV competency. Nevertheless, the role of the household as an enabling resource to improve the outcomes of PLHIV remains largely untapped by public HIV programmes; more research on improving household HIV competency is therefore required.

trial registrationPROSPERO registration: CRD42018094383.

Indexed as

Developing CountriesFamily CharacteristicsHealth PromotionHIV InfectionsHumansRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicFamilyHIV competencyHouseholdsInterventionsLow-and middle-income countries

Identifiers

PMID31842846
PMCPMC6916449

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.