Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31842836›Full record

ArticleBMC psychiatry2019

A qualitative comparison of experiences of specialist mother and baby units versus general psychiatric wards.

Jessica Griffiths, Billie Lever Taylor, Nicola Morant, Debra Bick, Louise M Howard, Gertrude Seneviratne, Sonia Johnson

Open access · goldAbstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in BMC psychiatry, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
3.8field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 40 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Parenting and Occupational Therapy: An Exploration of Global Practice.OTJR : occupation, participation and health · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Perinatal mental health: a review of progress and challenges.World psychiatry : official journal of the World Psychiatric Association (WPA) · 2020
    Article
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Jessica GriffithsDivision of Psychiatry, University College London, Maple House, 149 Tottenham Court Road, London, W1T 7NF, UK.
Billie Lever TaylorDivision of Psychiatry, University College London, Maple House, 149 Tottenham Court Road, London, W1T 7NF, UK. billie.taylor@ucl.ac.uk.ORCID 0000-0002-6865-3425
Nicola MorantDivision of Psychiatry, University College London, Maple House, 149 Tottenham Court Road, London, W1T 7NF, UK.
Debra BickWarwick Clinical Trials Unit, Warwick Medical School, University of Warwick, Gibbet Hill, Coventry, CV4 7AL, UK.
Louise M HowardSection of Women's Mental Health, Institute of Psychiatry Psychology and Neuroscience, King's College London, Crespigny Park, London, SE5 8AF, UK.
Gertrude SeneviratneSouth London and Maudsley NHS Foundation Trust Channi Kumar Mother and Baby Unit, Bethlem Royal Hospital, Monks Orchard Road, Beckenham, BR3 3BX, UK.
Sonia JohnsonDivision of Psychiatry, University College London, Maple House, 149 Tottenham Court Road, London, W1T 7NF, UK.
University College London · GBKing's College London · GBSouth London and Maudsley NHS Foundation Trust · GBUniversity of Warwick · GB

Funding

Department of Health RP-PG-1210-12002
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundMother and baby units (MBUs) are an inpatient mental health service where women experiencing acute severe postpartum psychiatric difficulties can be admitted with their babies. They are currently viewed as best practice in the UK and elsewhere. However, as service provision is fragmented, some women residing in areas without MBUs are admitted to acute general psychiatric wards without their infants. This study aimed to compare qualitatively experiences of these two service types from the perspectives of women and clinicians.

methodsSemi-structured interviews were conducted with fifteen women who received treatment for perinatal mental health problems on a general psychiatric ward and/or MBU in England. Two focus groups were also conducted, one with MBU staff (n = 11) and one with acute ward staff (n = 6). Data were analysed thematically.

resultsWomen generally preferred being co-admitted with their baby to an MBU over lone admission to a general psychiatric ward. Women and clinicians felt that MBUs provided more perinatally-focused, family-centred care, and were better-equipped to meet women's needs. General wards were reported by women and staff to lack the necessary facilities and expertise to support perinatal women adequately, while separation of mothers and babies was often experienced by women as traumatic and detrimental to recovery. However, some areas for improvement were also identified across both service types, particularly relating to difficulties transitioning home post-discharge, inadequate support for family members, staffing issues and access problems (with MBUs).

conclusionsFindings suggest that specialist perinatal inpatient care is considered preferable to generic care in the perinatal period from both service user and staff perspectives. Increased collaboration between perinatal and non-perinatal services could help improve perinatal expertise on general psychiatric wards, while further expansion of perinatal services (e.g. to cater for women currently considered too high risk for MBUs and for those discharged from inpatient settings) could tackle other shortfalls in care.

Indexed as

Maternal Health ServicesMental Health ServicesPatients' RoomsPsychiatric Department, HospitalAdultEnglandFemaleHospitalizationHumansInfant, NewbornInpatientsMaternal HealthMental DisordersMothersPatient DischargePerinatal CareAcute psychiatric wardMental healthMother and baby unitPerinatalQualitativeWomen

Identifiers

PMID31842836
PMCPMC6916441
OpenAlexW2995052422

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.