Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31842788›Full record

Trial reportBMC pregnancy and childbirth2019

Continuous versus discontinuous suture in perineal injuries produced during delivery in primiparous women: a randomized controlled trial.

Juan Miguel Martínez-Galiano, Beatriz Arredondo-López, Leticia Molina-Garcia, Ana Maria Cámara-Jurado, Eva Cocera-Ruiz, Miguel Rodríguez-Delgado

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in BMC pregnancy and childbirth, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03825211 (Continuous Versus Discontinuous Suture in the Perineals Lesions Produced During Delivery in Primiparous), which is not on this map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
1.8field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03825211 nacompletednot on this map

Continuous Versus Discontinuous Suture in the Perineals Lesions Produced During Delivery in Primiparous: Maternal Results: A Randomized Controlled Trial

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity of JaénRan2016 to 2018Enrolled134ConditionsPerineal Tear, Episiotomy WoundArmsContinuous suture in the perineals lesions, Discontinuous suture in the perineals lesions
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 17 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Observational
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Juan Miguel Martínez-GalianoDepartment of Nursing, University of Jaen, Jaen, Spain. juanmimartinezg@hotmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0878-8635
Beatriz Arredondo-LópezAndalusian Health Service, Jaen, Spain.
Leticia Molina-GarciaAndalusian Health Service, Jaen, Spain.
Ana Maria Cámara-JuradoAndalusian Health Service, Jaen, Spain.
Eva Cocera-RuizAndalusian Health Service, Jaen, Spain.
Miguel Rodríguez-DelgadoConsortium for Biomedical Research in Epidemiology and Public Health (CIBERESP), Madrid, Spain.
Andalusian Health Service · ESUniversidad de Jaén · ES

Funding

Instituto de Salud Carlos III CB 06/02/0011
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe technique used in the repair of a perineal injury resulting from childbirth could avoid discomfort and morbidity during the postpartum period. Recent studies show inconsistent results and support the need for new research with the inclusion of new health parameters not yet studied. Therefore, this study aims to evaluate if the suture technique (continuous or interrupted) has an effect on pain and other postpartum problems, incidence of incontinence (urinary and/or fecal), and the restart of sexual relations.

methodsA single-blind randomized clinical trial was conducted in five hospitals in south-east Spain. The participants were primiparous women who had experienced a perineal injury during delivery (second-degree tear or episiotomy). Data was collected on sociodemographic variables, variables associated with pregnancy, labor and delivery, and the postpartum period, and outcomes during the 3 months after delivery: pain, incontinence, and restart of sexual relations. Odds ratios (OR) were calculated by binary logistic regression to assess the influence of the suture type on binary outcomes and t-test used for comparing continuous outcomes. Multivariate analyses (using logistic regression -adjusted (aOR)- and analysis of covariance) were carried out to adjust for unbalanced variables after randomization.

resultsA total of 70 women were included in the intervention group (continuous suture) and 64 in the reference group (interrupted sutures). A negative association was observed (aOR = 0.39; 95% CI = 0.18-0.86) between a continuous suture and the need for analgesia at 24 h postpartum. Pain experienced by the women at 24 h postpartum was assessed as 4.4 ± 0.3 compared with a score of 3.4 ± 0.3 in the group with continuous sutures (p = 0.011). At 15 days postpartum, women in the intervention group experienced less pain (aOR = 0.38; 95% CI = 0.18-0.80) (p = 0.019). Urinary sphincter incontinence was also evaluated at 15 days, with 4.3% (n = 3) of the women in the intervention group presenting with urinary incontinence compared with 18.8% (n = 12) in the control group (aOR = 0.11; 95% CI = 0.03-0.47) (P = 0.003).

conclusionsThe women who had a continuous suture repair showed lower levels of pain from delivery to 3 months after delivery and had a lower incidence of urinary incontinence at 15 days postpartum.

trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov NCT03825211 posted January 31, 2019 (retrospectively registered).

Indexed as

AdultDelivery, ObstetricEpisiotomyFemaleHumansLacerationsObstetric Labor ComplicationsPerineumPostoperative ComplicationsPostpartum PeriodPregnancySingle-Blind MethodSpainSuture TechniquesTreatment OutcomeYoung AdultEpisiotomyIncontinencePainPerineal lesionSexual relationsSuture

Identifiers

PMID31842788
PMCPMC6916034
OpenAlexW2996052379

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.