Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31842772›Full record

ArticleBMC infectious diseases2019

Prepared for PrEP: preferences for HIV pre-exposure prophylaxis among Chinese men who have sex with men in an online national survey.

Wenting Huang, Dan Wu, Jason J Ong, M Kumi Smith, Stephen Pan, Fan Yang, Hongyun Fu, Weiming Tang, Joseph D Tucker

Erratum issuedOpen access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC infectious diseases, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 10 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.7field-weighted citation impact, top 29% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 23 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 3 institutions in 3 countries.

Wenting HuangUniversity of North Carolina at Chapel Hill Project-China, Guangzhou, China.
Dan WuUniversity of North Carolina at Chapel Hill Project-China, Guangzhou, China.
Jason J OngPopulation Health Science, Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK.
M Kumi SmithDivision of Epidemiology and Community Health, University of Minnesota Twin Cities, Twin Cities, USA.
Stephen Pan
Fan YangUniversity of North Carolina at Chapel Hill Project-China, Guangzhou, China.
Hongyun FuUniversity of North Carolina at Chapel Hill Project-China, Guangzhou, China.
Weiming TangUniversity of North Carolina at Chapel Hill Project-China, Guangzhou, China.
Joseph D TuckerUniversity of North Carolina at Chapel Hill Project-China, Guangzhou, China. jdtucker@med.unc.edu.ORCID 0000-0003-2804-1181
University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill · USUniversity of Bristol · GBUniversity of Minnesota · US

Funding

Virology, Immunology, and Microbiology CoreP30AI050410 · NIAID · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI DAVID M. MARGOLIS · 2001 to 2026
$76.9M
Spurring Innovation in HIV Testing and Linkage: A Crowdsourcing Approach -Diversity SupplementR01AI114310 · NIAID · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI TUCKER, JOSEPH DAVID, WEI, CHONGYI · 2014 to 2018
$3.3M
UNC-South China STD Research Training CenterD43TW009532 · FIC · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI COHEN, MYRON SCOTT, TUCKER, JOSEPH DAVID · 2013 to 2017
$1.3M
FIC NIH HHS 1D43TW009532FIC NIH HHS D43 TW009532NIAID NIH HHS P30 AI050410NIAID NIH HHS R01 AI114310
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) is not widely available in China. Previous studies reported low awareness and inconclusive findings on the acceptability of PrEP among Chinese men who have sex with men (MSM).

methodsWe conducted a secondary analysis of an online national survey comparing preferences for oral and long-acting injectable PrEP among MSM and identifying correlates of preferences. The study did not collect detailed information about partner types that may influence negotiated safety and PrEP uptake.

resultsNine-hundred and seventy-nine men from the larger sample of 1045 men responded to the PrEP survey questions. Most men (81.9%) had never heard of PrEP, but reported interest in using PrEP. More participants chose injectable PrEP (36.3%) as their preferred formulation than oral PrEP (24.6%). Men who had at least two HIV tests (adjusted OR = 1.36, 95%CI 1.04, 1.78) more commonly preferred injectable PrEP.

conclusionOur findings may help inform PrEP messaging in areas where PrEP has yet to be scaled up.

Indexed as

Administration, OralAdolescentAdultAwarenessChinaCross-Sectional StudiesEthnicityHIV InfectionsHomosexuality, MaleHumansInjectionsMaleMiddle AgedPatient Acceptance of Health CarePatient PreferencePre-Exposure ProphylaxisChinaHIVMen who have sex with menPre-exposure prophylaxisPreference

Identifiers

PMID31842772
PMCPMC6916236
OpenAlexW2995294795

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.