ArticleBMC genomics2019
ReVac: a reverse vaccinology computational pipeline for prioritization of prokaryotic protein vaccine candidates.
Article in BMC genomics, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
19 citing papers in PubMed, 37 citations in OpenAlex.
- AntiPan: a genome-informed in silico pipeline for advancing subunit vaccine discovery against Staphylococcus aureus.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Computational design of a novel multi-epitope vaccine candidate against group A rotavirus.Virology journal · 2026Article
- Article
- Article
- Article
- Host-pathogen interaction profiling of nontypeablemSphere · 2025Article
- Development of a multi-epitope vaccine from outer membrane proteins and identification of novel drug targets againstFrontiers in immunology · 2025Article
- NERVE 2.0: boosting the new enhanced reverse vaccinology environment via artificial intelligence and a user-friendly web interface.BMC bioinformatics · 2024Article
- Integrating pan-genome and reverse vaccinology to design multi-epitope vaccine against Herpes simplex virus type-1.3 Biotech · 2024Article
- Otitis media: recent advances in otitis media vaccine development and model systems.Frontiers in microbiology · 2024Review
- Review
- Editorial: Epidemic status and prevention of swine infectious diseases.Frontiers in veterinary science · 2023Article
- In Silico Analyses of Extracellular Proteins ofIranian journal of pharmaceutical research : IJPR · 2022Article
- Multi-Epitope Vaccine for Monkeypox Using Pan-Genome and Reverse Vaccinology Approaches.Viruses · 2022Article
- COVID-19 vaccine design using reverse and structural vaccinology, ontology-based literature mining and machine learning.Briefings in bioinformatics · 2022Article
- Design of a multi-epitope vaccine againstFrontiers in veterinary science · 2022Article
- An Update on "Reverse Vaccinology": The Pathway from Genomes and Epitope Predictions to Tailored, Recombinant Vaccines.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2022Review
- Pan-Genome Reverse Vaccinology Approach for the Design of Multi-Epitope Vaccine Construct againstInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2021Article
- Role of artificial intelligence in peptide vaccine design against RNA viruses.Informatics in medicine unlocked · 2021Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundReverse vaccinology accelerates the discovery of potential vaccine candidates (PVCs) prior to experimental validation. Current programs typically use one bacterial proteome to identify PVCs through a filtering architecture using feature prediction programs or a machine learning approach. Filtering approaches may eliminate potential antigens based on limitations in the accuracy of prediction tools used. Machine learning approaches are heavily dependent on the selection of training datasets with experimentally validated antigens (positive control) and non-protective-antigens (negative control). The use of one or few bacterial proteomes does not assess PVC conservation among strains, an important feature of vaccine antigens.
resultsWe present ReVac, which implements both a panoply of feature prediction programs without filtering out proteins, and scoring of candidates based on predictions made on curated positive and negative control PVCs datasets. ReVac surveys several genomes assessing protein conservation, as well as DNA and protein repeats, which may result in variable expression of PVCs. ReVac's orthologous clustering of conserved genes, identifies core and dispensable genome components. This is useful for determining the degree of conservation of PVCs among the population of isolates for a given pathogen. Potential vaccine candidates are then prioritized based on conservation and overall feature-based scoring. We present the application of ReVac, applied to 69 Moraxella catarrhalis and 270 non-typeable Haemophilus influenzae genomes, prioritizing 64 and 29 proteins as PVCs, respectively.
conclusionReVac's use of a scoring scheme ranks PVCs for subsequent experimental testing. It employs a redundancy-based approach in its predictions of features using several prediction tools. The protein's features are collated, and each protein is ranked based on the scoring scheme. Multi-genome analyses performed in ReVac allow for a comprehensive overview of PVCs from a pan-genome perspective, as an essential pre-requisite for any bacterial subunit vaccine design. ReVac prioritized PVCs of two human respiratory pathogens, identifying both novel and previously validated PVCs.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.