Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31842745›Full record

ArticleBMC genomics2019

ReVac: a reverse vaccinology computational pipeline for prioritization of prokaryotic protein vaccine candidates.

Adonis D'Mello, Christian P Ahearn, Timothy F Murphy, Hervé Tettelin

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC genomics, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 21% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 37 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Frontiers in immunology · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. In Silico Analyses of Extracellular Proteins ofIranian journal of pharmaceutical research : IJPR · 2022
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Design of a multi-epitope vaccine againstFrontiers in veterinary science · 2022
    Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Adonis D'MelloDepartment of Microbiology and Immunology, Institute for Genome Sciences, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, 21201, USA.
Christian P AhearnDepartment of Microbiology and Immunology, University at Buffalo, the State University of New York, Buffalo, NY, USA.
Timothy F MurphyDepartment of Microbiology and Immunology, University at Buffalo, the State University of New York, Buffalo, NY, USA.
Hervé TettelinDepartment of Microbiology and Immunology, Institute for Genome Sciences, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, 21201, USA. tettelin@som.umaryland.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0615-3257
University at Buffalo, State University of New York · USUniversity of Maryland, Baltimore · US

Funding

University of Buffalo Clinical and Translational Science Institute - Supplement SchulyerUL1TR001412 · NCATS · STATE UNIVERSITY OF NEW YORK AT BUFFALO · PI MURPHY, TIMOTHY F · 2015 to 2024
$33.8M
Persistent H. influenzae in COPD - virulence, vaccines and antibiotic resistanceR01AI019641 · NIAID · STATE UNIVERSITY OF NEW YORK AT BUFFALO · PI MURPHY, TIMOTHY F · 1985 to 2023
$7.9M
National Institutes of Health (US) R01AI019641National Institutes of Health (US) UL1TR001412NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR001412NIAID NIH HHS R01 AI019641
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundReverse vaccinology accelerates the discovery of potential vaccine candidates (PVCs) prior to experimental validation. Current programs typically use one bacterial proteome to identify PVCs through a filtering architecture using feature prediction programs or a machine learning approach. Filtering approaches may eliminate potential antigens based on limitations in the accuracy of prediction tools used. Machine learning approaches are heavily dependent on the selection of training datasets with experimentally validated antigens (positive control) and non-protective-antigens (negative control). The use of one or few bacterial proteomes does not assess PVC conservation among strains, an important feature of vaccine antigens.

resultsWe present ReVac, which implements both a panoply of feature prediction programs without filtering out proteins, and scoring of candidates based on predictions made on curated positive and negative control PVCs datasets. ReVac surveys several genomes assessing protein conservation, as well as DNA and protein repeats, which may result in variable expression of PVCs. ReVac's orthologous clustering of conserved genes, identifies core and dispensable genome components. This is useful for determining the degree of conservation of PVCs among the population of isolates for a given pathogen. Potential vaccine candidates are then prioritized based on conservation and overall feature-based scoring. We present the application of ReVac, applied to 69 Moraxella catarrhalis and 270 non-typeable Haemophilus influenzae genomes, prioritizing 64 and 29 proteins as PVCs, respectively.

conclusionReVac's use of a scoring scheme ranks PVCs for subsequent experimental testing. It employs a redundancy-based approach in its predictions of features using several prediction tools. The protein's features are collated, and each protein is ranked based on the scoring scheme. Multi-genome analyses performed in ReVac allow for a comprehensive overview of PVCs from a pan-genome perspective, as an essential pre-requisite for any bacterial subunit vaccine design. ReVac prioritized PVCs of two human respiratory pathogens, identifying both novel and previously validated PVCs.

Indexed as

BacteriaBacterial ProteinsBacterial VaccinesComputational BiologyHumansMachine LearningSoftwareVaccines, SubunitVaccinologyBacterial ProteinsBacterial VaccinesVaccines, SubunitAntigen scoringBacterialCore genomeOrthologyPan-genomeReverse vaccinologyVaccines

Identifiers

PMID31842745
PMCPMC6916091
OpenAlexW2996057451

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.