Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31842731›Full record

ArticleBMC genomics2019

Convergent degeneration of olfactory receptor gene repertoires in marine mammals.

Ake Liu, Funan He, Libing Shen, Ruixiang Liu, Zhijun Wang, Jingqi Zhou

Open access · goldAbstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in BMC genomics, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
25citing papers in PubMed
2.8field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

25 citing papers in PubMed, 45 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Prioritising research on endocrine disruption in the marine environment: a global perspective.Biological reviews of the Cambridge Philosophical Society · 2026
    Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Divergent sensory and immune gene evolution in sea turtles with contrasting demographic and life histories.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2023
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Ake LiuFaculty of Biological Science and Technology, Changzhi University, Changzhi, Shanxi, 046011, People's Republic of China.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9086-9425
Funan HeSchool of Life Sciences, Fudan University, Shanghai, 200438, People's Republic of China.
Libing ShenInstitute of Neuroscience, Shanghai Institute for Biological Sciences, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Shanghai, 200031, People's Republic of China.
Ruixiang LiuFaculty of Biological Science and Technology, Changzhi University, Changzhi, Shanxi, 046011, People's Republic of China.
Zhijun WangDepartment of Chemistry, Changzhi University, Changzhi, Shanxi, 046011, People's Republic of China. czxywzj@163.com.
Jingqi ZhouSchool of Public Health, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, 200025, People's Republic of China. jingqizhou@sjtu.edu.cn.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9961-199X
Changzhi University · CNChinese Academy of Sciences · CNFudan University · CNShanghai Jiao Tong University · CN

Funding

National Science Foundation of China 31801049Scientific and Technological Innovation Programs of Higher Education Institutions in Shanxi (STIP) 2019L0897
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundOlfactory receptors (ORs) can bind odor molecules and play a crucial role in odor sensation. Due to the frequent gains and losses of genes during evolution, the number of OR members varies greatly among different species. However, whether the extent of gene gains/losses varies between marine mammals and related terrestrial mammals has not been clarified, and the factors that might underlie these variations are unknown.

resultsTo address these questions, we identified more than 10,000 members of the OR family in 23 mammals and classified them into 830 orthologous gene groups (OGGs) and 281 singletons. Significant differences occurred in the number of OR repertoires and OGGs among different species. We found that all marine mammals had fewer OR genes than their related terrestrial lineages, with the fewest OR genes found in cetaceans, which may be closely related to olfactory degradation. ORs with more gene duplications or loss events tended to be under weaker purifying selection. The average gain and loss rates of OR genes in terrestrial mammals were higher than those of mammalian gene families, while the average gain and loss rates of OR genes in marine mammals were significantly lower and much higher than those of mammalian gene families, respectively. Additionally, we failed to detect any one-to-one orthologous genes in the focal species, suggesting that OR genes are not well conserved among marine mammals.

conclusionsMarine mammals have experienced large numbers of OR gene losses compared with their related terrestrial lineages, which may result from the frequent birth-and-death evolution under varied functional constrains. Due to their independent degeneration, OR genes present in each lineage are not well conserved among marine mammals. Our study provides a basis for future research on the olfactory receptor function in mammals from the perspective of evolutionary trajectories.

Indexed as

AnimalsAquatic OrganismsEvolution, MolecularGene DeletionMammalsMultigene FamilyPhylogenyReceptors, OdorantSelection, GeneticSequence Analysis, DNAReceptors, OdorantConvergent degenerationGene gainGene lossMarine mammalsOlfactory receptorsOrthologous gene groups

Identifiers

PMID31842731
PMCPMC6916060
OpenAlexW2996295061

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.