Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31842524›Full record

ReviewJournal of clinical research in pediatric endocrinology2020

A Proposal for the Interpretation of Serum IGF-I Concentration as Part of Laboratory Screening in Children with Growth Failure

Jan M. Wit, Martin Bidlingmaier, Christiaan de Bruin, Wilma Oostdijk

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of clinical research in pediatric endocrinology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. A Proposal to Develop New References for Serum IGF-I Levels in ChildrenJournal of clinical research in pediatric endocrinology · 2020
    Guideline
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Important Tools for Use by Pediatric Endocrinologists in the Assessment of Short StatureJournal of clinical research in pediatric endocrinology · 2021
    Review
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Jan M. WitLeiden University Medical Center, Department of Paediatrics, Leiden, The NetherlandsORCID 0000-0002-1715-5020
Martin BidlingmaierKlinikum der Universität München, Medizinische Klinik und Poliklinik IV, Endocrine Research Laboratories, Munich, GermanyORCID 0000-0002-4681-6668
Christiaan de BruinLeiden University Medical Center, Department of Paediatrics, Leiden, The NetherlandsORCID 0000-0003-1478-2261
Wilma OostdijkLeiden University Medical Center, Department of Paediatrics, Leiden, The NetherlandsORCID 0000-0003-0180-2470

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The serum insulin-like growth factor-I (IGF-I) concentration is commonly used as a screening tool for growth hormone deficiency (GHD), but there is no consensus on the cut-off limit of IGF-I standard deviation score (SDS) to perform GH stimulation tests for confirmation or exclusion of GHD. We argue that the cut-off limit is dependent on the clinical pre-test likelihood of GHD and propose a diagnostic strategy in which the cut-off limit varies between zero to -2 SDS.

Indexed as

Reference StandardsAdolescentAdultChildChild, PreschoolFemaleGrowth DisordersHumansInsulin-Like Growth Factor Binding Protein 3Insulin-Like Growth Factor IMaleNetherlandsPediatricsSocieties, MedicalYoung AdultIGF1 protein, humanIGFBP3 protein, humanInsulin-Like Growth Factor Binding Protein 3Insulin-Like Growth Factor Igrowth disordersIGFBP-3IGF-IShort stature

Identifiers

PMID31842524
PMCPMC7291410

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.