Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31842404›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of molecular sciences2019

A Deep Learning Model for Cell Growth Inhibition IC50 Prediction and Its Application for Gastric Cancer Patients.

Minjae Joo, Aron Park, Kyungdoc Kim, Won-Joon Son, Hyo Sug Lee, GyuTae Lim, Jinhyuk Lee, Dae Ho Lee, Jungseok An, Jung Ho Kim and 2 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of molecular sciences, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 35 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
35citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

35 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Ligand-Based Compound Activity Prediction via Few-Shot Learning.Journal of chemical information and modeling · 2024
    Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Minjae JooDepartment of Health Sciences and Technology, Gachon Advanced Institute for Health Sciences and Technology, Gachon University, Incheon 21999, Korea.
Aron ParkDepartment of Health Sciences and Technology, Gachon Advanced Institute for Health Sciences and Technology, Gachon University, Incheon 21999, Korea.
Kyungdoc KimVUNO Inc., Seoul 06536, Korea.
Won-Joon SonSamsung Advanced Institute of Technology, Suwon, Gyeonggi-do 16678, Korea.ORCID 0000-0003-4087-4661
Hyo Sug LeeSamsung Advanced Institute of Technology, Suwon, Gyeonggi-do 16678, Korea.
GyuTae LimKorean Bioinformation Center (KOBIC), Korea Research Institute of Bioscience and Biotechnology (KRIBB), Daejeon 34141, Korea.
Jinhyuk LeeKorean Bioinformation Center (KOBIC), Korea Research Institute of Bioscience and Biotechnology (KRIBB), Daejeon 34141, Korea.
Dae Ho LeeDepartment of Health Sciences and Technology, Gachon Advanced Institute for Health Sciences and Technology, Gachon University, Incheon 21999, Korea.
Jungseok AnDepartment of Pathology, Gachon University Gil Medical Center, Gachon University School of Medicine, Incheon 21565, Korea.
Jung Ho KimDepartment of Internal Medicine, Gachon University Gil Medical Center, Gachon University School of Medicine, Incheon 21565, Korea.
TaeJin AhnDepartment of Life Sciences, Handong Global University, Pohang 37554, Korea.
Seungyoon NamDepartment of Health Sciences and Technology, Gachon Advanced Institute for Health Sciences and Technology, Gachon University, Incheon 21999, Korea.ORCID 0000-0002-0966-7915

Funding

National Research Foundation of Korea 2016R1D1A1B03933145
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Heterogeneity in intratumoral cancers leads to discrepancies in drug responsiveness, due to diverse genomics profiles. Thus, prediction of drug responsiveness is critical in precision medicine. So far, in drug responsiveness prediction, drugs' molecular "fingerprints", along with mutation statuses, have not been considered. Here, we constructed a 1-dimensional convolution neural network model, DeepIC50, to predict three drug responsiveness classes, based on 27,756 features including mutation statuses and various drug molecular fingerprints. As a result, DeepIC50 showed better cell viability IC50 prediction accuracy in pan-cancer cell lines over two independent cancer cell line datasets. Gastric cancer (GC) is not only one of the lethal cancer types in East Asia, but also a heterogeneous cancer type. Currently approved targeted therapies in GC are only trastuzumab and ramucirumab. Responsive GC patients for the drugs are limited, and more drugs should be developed in GC. Due to the importance of GC, we applied DeepIC50 to a real GC patient dataset. Drug responsiveness prediction in the patient dataset by DeepIC50, when compared to the other models, were comparable to responsiveness observed in GC cell lines. DeepIC50 could possibly accurately predict drug responsiveness, to new compounds, in diverse cancer cell lines, in the drug discovery process.

Indexed as

Deep LearningModels, BiologicalAntineoplastic AgentsArtificial IntelligenceCell Line, TumorCell SurvivalComputational BiologyDose-Response Relationship, DrugDrug DiscoveryHumansInhibitory Concentration 50Neural Networks, ComputerROC CurveStomach NeoplasmsAntineoplastic Agentsartificial intelligencedrug discoverydrug responsiveness prediction

Identifiers

PMID31842404
PMCPMC6941066

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.