Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31842311›Full record

ArticleNanomaterials (Basel, Switzerland)2019

Comparison of Different Approaches to Surface Functionalization of Biodegradable Polycaprolactone Scaffolds.

Elizaveta S Permyakova, Philipp V Kiryukhantsev-Korneev, Kristina Yu Gudz, Anton S Konopatsky, Josef Polčak, Irina Y Zhitnyak, Natalia A Gloushankova, D V Shtansky, Anton M Manakhov

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nanomaterials (Basel, Switzerland), 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed
3.1field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 52 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Elizaveta S PermyakovaNational University of Science and Technology "MISIS", Leninsky prospect 4, Moscow 119049, Russia.ORCID 0000-0003-2581-0803
Philipp V Kiryukhantsev-KorneevNational University of Science and Technology "MISIS", Leninsky prospect 4, Moscow 119049, Russia.ORCID 0000-0003-1635-4746
Kristina Yu GudzNational University of Science and Technology "MISIS", Leninsky prospect 4, Moscow 119049, Russia.ORCID 0000-0002-8990-9784
Anton S KonopatskyNational University of Science and Technology "MISIS", Leninsky prospect 4, Moscow 119049, Russia.
Josef PolčakCEITEC-Central European Institute of Technology, Brno University of Technology, Purkyňova 123, 601 90 Brno, Czech Republic.ORCID 0000-0002-6571-6291
Irina Y ZhitnyakN.N. Blokhin Russian Cancer Research Center, Kashirskoe shosse 24, Moscow 115478, Russia.ORCID 0000-0002-6717-3745
Natalia A GloushankovaN.N. Blokhin Russian Cancer Research Center, Kashirskoe shosse 24, Moscow 115478, Russia.ORCID 0000-0002-2044-2063
D V ShtanskyNational University of Science and Technology "MISIS", Leninsky prospect 4, Moscow 119049, Russia.
Anton M ManakhovScientific Institute of Clinical and Experimental Lymphology- Branch of the ICG SB RAS, 2 Timakova str., Novosibirsk 630060, Russia.ORCID 0000-0003-4517-1682
National University of Science and Technology · RURussian Cancer Research Center NN Blokhin · RUCentral European Institute of Technology · CZSiberian Branch of the Russian Academy of Sciences · RU

Funding

Ministry of Education and Science of the Russian Federation (Increase Competitiveness Program of NUST "MISiS" ) K2-2018-012Ministry of Education, Youth and Sports of the Czech Republic (MEYS CR) CEITEC 2020 (LQ1601)Russian Science Foundation 18-75-10057
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Due to their good mechanical stability compared to gelatin, collagen or polyethylene glycol nanofibers and slow degradation rate, biodegradable poly-ε-caprolactone (PCL) nanofibers are promising material as scaffolds for bone and soft-tissue engineering. Here, PCL nanofibers were prepared by the electrospinning method and then subjected to surface functionalization aimed at improving their biocompatibility and bioactivity. For surface modification, two approaches were used: (i) COOH-containing polymer was deposited on the PCL surface using atmospheric pressure plasma copolymerization of CO

Indexed as

mineralizationplasma modificationpolycaprolactone nanofiberstissue engineeringXPS

Identifiers

PMID31842311
PMCPMC6955782
OpenAlexW2995526002

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.