ArticleClinical journal of sport medicine : official journal of the Canadian Academy of Sport Medicine2020
Part II: Comparison of Crossfit-Related Injury Presenting to Sports Medicine Clinic by Sex and Age.
Article in Clinical journal of sport medicine : official journal of the Canadian Academy of Sport Medicine, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed, 28 citations in OpenAlex.
- Ultrasound-Based Morphological and Functional Assessment in Male CrossFit Athletes with Unilateral Subacromial Shoulder Pain: An Observational Study.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2025Observational
- CrossFitJournal of functional morphology and kinesiology · 2025Article
- Sport-Related Injuries in Portuguese CrossFitMuscles (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Epidemiological Profile among Greek CrossFit Practitioners.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2023Article
- Risk Factors for Injury in CrossFitInternational journal of environmental research and public health · 2023Article
- Characteristics of Fitness-Related Injuries in The Netherlands: A Descriptive Epidemiological Study.Sports (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Article
- Predicting the Clean Movement Technique in CrossfitInternational journal of environmental research and public health · 2022Article
- Upper Extremity Injuries in CrossFit Athletes-a Review of the Current Literature.Current reviews in musculoskeletal medicine · 2022Review
- Correlation between previous sedentary lifestyle and CrossFit-related injuries.Einstein (Sao Paulo, Brazil) · 2021Article
- High-Intensity Multimodal Training for Young People: It's Time to Think Inside the Box!Frontiers in physiology · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
objectiveTo examine CrossFit-related injuries based on sex and age.
designRetrospective case series.
settingA tertiary-level pediatric sports medicine clinic.
participantsCrossFit athletes.
main outcome measuresCrossFit-related injuries by sex (males vs females) and age groups (≤19 years vs >19 years) using a χ analysis with P = 0.05, odds ratio (OR), and 95% confidence interval (95% CI).
resultsAmong injured CrossFit athletes, female athletes sustained lower extremity injuries more frequently than male athletes (P = 0.011; OR, 2.65; 95% CI, 1.25-5.65). In observed CrossFit injuries, shoulder injuries were more frequently observed in male athletes compared with female athletes (P = 0.049; OR, 2.79; 95% CI, 0.98-7.95). Additionally, a greater proportion of CrossFit athletes aged 19 years and younger suffered trunk/spine injuries than those older than 19 years (P = 0.027; OR, 2.61; 95% CI, 1.10-6.21) in injured CrossFit athletes.
conclusionsThe current results indicated sex- and age-specific susceptibility to CrossFit-related injuries based on body parts and diagnoses. The presented information may be useful to develop a safer exercise program, especially for pediatric and adolescent CrossFit participants.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.