Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31841947›Full record

ArticleMedical image analysis2020

Multi-modal neuroimaging feature selection with consistent metric constraint for diagnosis of Alzheimer's disease.

Xiaoke Hao, Yongjin Bao, Yingchun Guo, Ming Yu, Daoqiang Zhang, Shannon L Risacher, Andrew J Saykin, Xiaohui Yao, Li Shen, Alzheimer's Disease Neuroimaging Initiative

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Medical image analysis, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 43 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
43citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

43 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Xiaoke HaoSchool of Artificial Intelligence, Hebei University of Technology, Tianjin 300401, China.
Yongjin BaoSchool of Artificial Intelligence, Hebei University of Technology, Tianjin 300401, China.
Yingchun GuoSchool of Artificial Intelligence, Hebei University of Technology, Tianjin 300401, China. Electronic address: gyc@scse.hebut.edu.cn.
Ming YuSchool of Artificial Intelligence, Hebei University of Technology, Tianjin 300401, China.
Daoqiang ZhangSchool of Computer Science and Technology, Nanjing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics, Nanjing 211106, China. Electronic address: dqzhang@nuaa.edu.cn.
Shannon L RisacherDepartment of Radiology and Imaging Sciences, School of Medicine, Indiana University, Indianapolis 46202, USA.
Andrew J SaykinDepartment of Radiology and Imaging Sciences, School of Medicine, Indiana University, Indianapolis 46202, USA.
Xiaohui YaoDepartment of Biostatistics, Epidemiology and Informatics, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia 19104, USA.
Li ShenDepartment of Biostatistics, Epidemiology and Informatics, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia 19104, USA. Electronic address: Li.Shen@pennmedicine.upenn.edu.
Alzheimer's Disease Neuroimaging Initiative

Funding

Project 1U19AG024904 · NIA · NORTHERN CALIFORNIA INSTITUTE/RES/EDU · PI MICHAEL W WEINER · 2016 to 2026
$226.7M
Alzheimer's Disease Neuroimaging Initiative - SupplementU01AG024904 · NIA · NORTHERN CALIFORNIA INSTITUTE RES &EDUC · PI WEINER, MICHAEL W · 2004 to 2015
$121.0M
Research Education ComponentP30AG010133 · NIA · INDIANA UNIV-PURDUE UNIV AT INDIANAPOLIS · PI SAYKIN, ANDREW J · 1991 to 2020
$37.3M
Memory Circuitry in MCI and Early Alzheimer’s Disease Prodrome: Molecular DriversR01AG019771 · NIA · INDIANA UNIV-PURDUE UNIV AT INDIANAPOLIS · PI SAYKIN, ANDREW J · 2001 to 2021
$6.9M
Integrative Bioinformatics Approaches to Human Brain Genomics and ConnectomicsR01EB022574 · NIBIB · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI SHEN, LI · 2016 to 2019
$1.9M
Bioinformatics Strategies for Multidimensional Brain Imaging GeneticsR01LM011360 · NLM · INDIANA UNIVERSITY INDIANAPOLIS · PI MOORE, JASON H., SAYKIN, ANDREW J · 2012 to 2015
$1.4M
NIA NIH HHS P30 AG010133NIA NIH HHS R01 AG019771NIA NIH HHS U01 AG024904NIA NIH HHS U19 AG024904NIBIB NIH HHS R01 EB022574NLM NIH HHS R01 LM011360
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The accurate diagnosis of Alzheimer's disease (AD) and its early stage, e.g., mild cognitive impairment (MCI), is essential for timely treatment or possible intervention to slow down AD progression. Recent studies have demonstrated that multiple neuroimaging and biological measures contain complementary information for diagnosis and prognosis. Therefore, information fusion strategies with multi-modal neuroimaging data, such as voxel-based measures extracted from structural MRI (VBM-MRI) and fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography (FDG-PET), have shown their effectiveness for AD diagnosis. However, most existing methods are proposed to simply integrate the multi-modal data, but do not make full use of structure information across the different modalities. In this paper, we propose a novel multi-modal neuroimaging feature selection method with consistent metric constraint (MFCC) for AD analysis. First, the similarity is calculated for each modality (i.e. VBM-MRI or FDG-PET) individually by random forest strategy, which can extract pairwise similarity measures for multiple modalities. Then the group sparsity regularization term and the sample similarity constraint regularization term are used to constrain the objective function to conduct feature selection from multiple modalities. Finally, the multi-kernel support vector machine (MK-SVM) is used to fuse the features selected from different models for final classification. The experimental results on the Alzheimer's Disease Neuroimaging Initiative (ADNI) show that the proposed method has better classification performance than the start-of-the-art multimodality-based methods. Specifically, we achieved higher accuracy and area under the curve (AUC) for AD versus normal controls (NC), MCI versus NC, and MCI converters (MCI-C) versus MCI non-converters (MCI-NC) on ADNI datasets. Therefore, the proposed model not only outperforms the traditional method in terms of AD/MCI classification, but also discovers the characteristics associated with the disease, demonstrating its promise for improving disease-related mechanistic understanding.

Indexed as

AlgorithmsAgedAlzheimer DiseaseDatasets as TopicFemaleHumansImage EnhancementImage Interpretation, Computer-AssistedMaleMultimodal ImagingNeuroimagingAlzheimer's diseaseFeature selectionMild cognitive impairmentMulti-modal neuroimagingSimilarity measures

Identifiers

PMID31841947
PMCPMC6980345

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.