Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31841822›Full record

ReviewAdvances in medical sciences2020

The clinical applications of a multigene liquid biopsy (NETest) in neuroendocrine tumors.

Anna Malczewska, Beata Kos-Kudła, Mark Kidd, Ignat Drozdov, Lisa Bodei, Somer Matar, Kjell Oberg, Irvin M Modlin

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Advances in medical sciences, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 32 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
32citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

32 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Role ofFrontiers in medicine · 2025
    Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. PET/MRI imaging in neuroendocrine neoplasm.Abdominal radiology (New York) · 2023
    Review
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. PET/CT and PET/MRI in neuroendocrine neoplasms.Abdominal radiology (New York) · 2022
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Anna MalczewskaDepartment of Endocrinology and Neuroendocrine Tumors, Medical University of Silesia, Katowice, Poland. Electronic address: malczewska.an@gmail.com.
Beata Kos-KudłaDepartment of Endocrinology and Neuroendocrine Tumors, Medical University of Silesia, Katowice, Poland.
Mark KiddWren Laboratories, Branford, CT, USA.
Ignat DrozdovWren Laboratories, Branford, CT, USA.
Lisa BodeiMemorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA.
Somer MatarWren Laboratories, Branford, CT, USA.
Kjell ObergDepartment of Endocrine Oncology, University Hospital, Uppsala, Sweden.
Irvin M ModlinGastroenterological Surgery, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, USA.

Funding

X-RAY CRYSTALLOGRAPHYP30CA008748 · NCI · SLOAN-KETTERING INSTITUTE FOR CANCER RES · PI Nicholas D Socci · 1985 to 2026
$347.4M
NCI NIH HHS P30 CA008748
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeThere are few effective biomarkers for neuroendocrine tumors. Precision oncology strategies have provided liquid biopsies for real-time and tailored decision-making. This has led to the development of the first neuroendocrine tumor liquid biopsy (the NETest). The NETest represents a transcriptomic signature of neuroendocrine tumor (NETs) that captures tumor biology and disease activity. The data have direct clinical application in terms of identifying residual disease, disease progress and the efficacy of treatment. In this overview we assess the available published information on the metrics and clinical efficacy of the NETest. MATERIAL AND

methodsPublished data on the NETest have been collated and analyzed to understand the clinical application of this multianalyte biomarker in NETs.

resultsNETest assay has been validated as a standardized and reproducible clinical laboratory measurement. It is not affected by demographic characteristics, or acid suppressive medication. Clinical utility of the NETest has been documented in gastroenteropancreatic, bronchopulmonary NETs, in paragangliomas and pheochromocytomas. The test facilitates accurate diagnosis of a NET disease, and real-time monitoring of the disease status (stable/progressive disease). It predicts aggressive tumor behavior, identifies operative tumor resection, and efficacy of the medical treatment (e.g. somatostatin analogues), or peptide receptor radionuclide therapy (PRRT). NETest metrics and clinical applications out-perform standard biomarkers like chromogranin A.

conclusionsThe NETest exhibits clinically competent metrics as an effective biomarker for neuroendocrine tumors. Measurement of NET transcripts in blood is a significant advance in neuroendocrine tumor management and demonstrates that blood provides a viable source to identify and monitor tumor status.

Indexed as

Biomarkers, TumorHumansLiquid BiopsyNeuroendocrine TumorsTreatment OutcomeBiomarkers, TumorCarcinoidCgALiquid biopsyNETestNeuroendocrine

Identifiers

PMID31841822
PMCPMC7453408

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.