Trial reportBody image2020
Sexual orientation correlates with baseline characteristics but shows no moderating effects of dissonance-based eating disorder prevention programs for women.
Trial report in Body image, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.
- Cost-effectiveness of Intervention Implementation Support for Reducing Eating Disorder Symptoms Among College Students.Prevention science : the official journal of the Society for Prevention Research · 2024Trial
- An experimental test of increasing implementation support for college peer educators delivering an evidence-based prevention program.Journal of consulting and clinical psychology · 2023Trial
- Implementation factors that predict larger effects from a peer educator delivered eating disorder prevention program at universities.Journal of consulting and clinical psychology · 2023Article
- The role of sexual orientation in the relationships between body perception, body weight dissatisfaction, physical comparison, and eating psychopathology in the cisgender population.Eating and weight disorders : EWD · 2021Article
- The need for more inclusive measurement to advance equity in eating disorders prevention.Eating disordersArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
This study provided the first test of whether sexual orientation (categorized as heterosexual vs. sexual minority) is associated with baseline eating disorder risk factors and symptoms, moderated the intervention effects of variants of the dissonance-based Body Project, or moderated the relation of baseline risk factors to future change in eating disorder symptoms. A total of 680 women with body image concerns were randomized to clinician-or peer-led Body Project groups, the eBody Project, or educational video control and completed assessment of eating disorder risk factors and symptoms at pretest, posttest, and at six-, 12-, 24-, and 36-month follow-up. Results indicated that sexual minority women had significantly higher negative affect and impaired psychosocial functioning at baseline, but did not differ on other eating disorder risk factors or symptoms. We found no evidence that sexual orientation moderates the effects of the Body Project on risk factor or symptom change over follow-up or the relation of baseline risk factors to future change in eating disorder symptoms. Overall, sexual minority and heterosexual women differ on two, less specific eating disorder-related risk factors at baseline, but did not differ in response to different versions of the Body Project or the relations of risk factors to future symptom change.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.