ArticlePloS one2019
Increased performance of DNA metabarcoding of macroinvertebrates by taxonomic sorting.
Article in PloS one, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
14 citing papers in PubMed.
- Soil Moisture and Prey Life Cycles Promote Seasonal Dietary Shift in a Grassland-Breeding Migratory Shorebird.Ecology and evolution · 2026Article
- Seasonal Dynamics of the Gut Microbiome in Urban Feral Pigeons Are Associated With Environmental Conditions, Not With Diet Shifts.Ecology and evolution · 2026Article
- Diatoms (Bacillariophyta) of the Salish Sea, Northeast Pacific: annotated checklist and new species reports.Biodiversity data journal · 2026Article
- Maximizing Identification Precision of Hymenoptera and Brachycera (Diptera) With a Non-Destructive DNA Metabarcoding Approach.Ecology and evolution · 2025Article
- Taxonomic and metabolic characterisation of biofilms colonising Roman stuccoes at Baia's thermal baths and restoration strategies.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- The dilemma of underestimating freshwater biodiversity: morphological and molecular approaches.BMC ecology and evolution · 2024Article
- Repeated subsamples during DNA extraction reveal increased diversity estimates in DNA metabarcoding of Malaise traps.Ecology and evolution · 2022Article
- Curation of a reference database of COI sequences for insect identification through DNA metabarcoding: COins.Database : the journal of biological databases and curation · 2022Article
- Environmental DNA metabarcoding reveals comparable responses to agricultural stressors on different trophic levels of a freshwater community.Molecular ecology · 2022Article
- Article
- A comparison of genetically and morphometrically identified macroinvertebrate community index scores with implications for aquatic life use attainment.Environmental monitoring and assessment · 2021Article
- Diversity and composition of macroinvertebrate communities in a rare inland salt marsh.Ecology and evolution · 2021Article
- Excluding spatial sampling bias does not eliminate oversplitting in DNA-based species delimitation analyses.Ecology and evolution · 2021Article
- Pooling size sorted Malaise trap fractions to maximize taxon recovery with metabarcoding.PeerJ · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
DNA-based identification through the use of metabarcoding has been proposed as the next step in the monitoring of biological communities, such as those assessed under the Water Framework Directive (WFD). Advances have been made in the field of metabarcoding, but challenges remain when using complex samples. Uneven biomass distributions, preferential amplification and reference database deficiencies can all lead to discrepancies between morphological and DNA-based taxa lists. The effects of different taxonomic groups on these issues remain understudied. By metabarcoding WFD monitoring samples, we analyzed six different taxonomic groups of freshwater organisms, both separately and combined. Identifications based on metabarcoding data were compared directly to morphological assessments performed under the WFD. The diversity of taxa for both morphological and DNA-based assessments was similar, although large differences were observed in some samples. The overlap between the two taxon lists was 56.8% on average across all taxa, and was highest for Crustacea, Heteroptera, and Coleoptera, and lowest for Annelida and Mollusca. Taxonomic sorting in six basic groups before DNA extraction and amplification improved taxon recovery by 46.5%. The impact on ecological quality ratio (EQR) scoring was considerable when replacing morphology with DNA-based identifications, but there was a high correlation when only replacing a single taxonomic group with molecular data. Different taxonomic groups provide their own challenges and benefits. Some groups might benefit from a more consistent and robust method of identification. Others present difficulties in molecular processing, due to uneven biomass distributions, large genetic diversity or shortcomings of the reference database. Sorting samples into basic taxonomic groups that require little taxonomic knowledge greatly improves the recovery of taxa with metabarcoding. Current standards for EQR monitoring may not be easily replaced completely with molecular strategies, but the effectiveness of molecular methods opens up the way for a paradigm shift in biomonitoring.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.