Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31841364›Full record

Trial reportJournal of speech, language, and hearing research : JSLHR2020

Individual Differences in Distributional Learning for Speech: What's Ideal for Ideal Observers?

Rachel M Theodore, Nicholas R Monto, Stephen Graham

Abstract readClinical Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Journal of speech, language, and hearing research : JSLHR, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Phonetic variability leads to gradient speech perception.Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Individual Differences in Lexical Contributions to Speech Perception.Journal of speech, language, and hearing research : JSLHR · 2021
    Article
  11. Article
  12. The Fast-Mapping Abilities of Adults With Developmental Language Disorder.Journal of speech, language, and hearing research : JSLHR · 2020
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Rachel M TheodoreDepartment of Speech, Language, and Hearing Sciences, University of Connecticut, Storrs.
Nicholas R MontoDepartment of Speech, Language, and Hearing Sciences, University of Connecticut, Storrs.
Stephen GrahamDepartment of Speech, Language, and Hearing Sciences, University of Connecticut, Storrs.

Funding

Determinants of phonetic category structure in language impairmentR21DC016141 · NIDCD · UNIVERSITY OF CONNECTICUT STORRS · PI THEODORE, RACHEL MARIE · 2017 to 2019
$464k
NIDCD NIH HHS R21 DC016141
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Purpose Speech perception is facilitated by listeners' ability to dynamically modify the mapping to speech sounds given systematic variation in speech input. For example, the degree to which listeners show categorical perception of speech input changes as a function of distributional variability in the input, with perception becoming less categorical as the input, becomes more variable. Here, we test the hypothesis that higher level receptive language ability is linked to the ability to adapt to low-level distributional cues in speech input. Method Listeners (

Indexed as

IndividualityAcoustic StimulationAdolescentAdultCuesFemaleHumansMalePhoneticsSpeech PerceptionVerbal LearningYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID31841364
PMCPMC7213488

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.