ArticleMolecular biology and evolution2020
A Depletion of Stop Codons in lincRNA is Owing to Transfer of Selective Constraint from Coding Sequences.
Article in Molecular biology and evolution, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.
- Evidence in disease and non-disease contexts that nonsense mutations cause altered splicing via motif disruption.Nucleic acids research · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Although the constraints on a gene's sequence are often assumed to reflect the functioning of that gene, here we propose transfer selection, a constraint operating on one class of genes transferred to another, mediated by shared binding factors. We show that such transfer can explain an otherwise paradoxical depletion of stop codons in long intergenic noncoding RNAs (lincRNAs). Serine/arginine-rich proteins direct the splicing machinery by binding exonic splice enhancers (ESEs) in immature mRNA. As coding exons cannot contain stop codons in one reading frame, stop codons should be rare within ESEs. We confirm that the stop codon density (SCD) in ESE motifs is low, even accounting for nucleotide biases. Given that serine/arginine-rich proteins binding ESEs also facilitate lincRNA splicing, a low SCD could transfer to lincRNAs. As predicted, multiexon lincRNA exons are depleted in stop codons, a result not explained by open reading frame (ORF) contamination. Consistent with transfer selection, stop codon depletion in lincRNAs is most acute in exonic regions with the highest ESE density, disappears when ESEs are masked, is consistent with stop codon usage skews in ESEs, and is diminished in both single-exon lincRNAs and introns. Owing to low SCD, the maximum lengths of pseudo-ORFs frequently exceed null expectations. This has implications for ORF annotation and the evolution of de novo protein-coding genes from lincRNAs. We conclude that not all constraints operating on genes need be explained by the functioning of the gene but may instead be transferred owing to shared binding factors.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.