Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31841146›Full record

ArticleJournal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA2020

Pediatric patient portal use in one health system.

Peter G Szilagyi, Rebecca Valderrama, Sitaram Vangala, Christina Albertin, David Okikawa, Michael Sloyan, Nathalie Lopez, Carlos F Lerner

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. [Application and Effect of Patient Portal System in the Remote Management of Chronic Diseases for Older Adults With Coronary Heart Disease].Sichuan da xue xue bao. Yi xue ban = Journal of Sichuan University. Medical science edition · 2024
    Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Electronic patient portal activation and outcomes among pediatric patients with asthma.The journal of allergy and clinical immunology. In practice · 2023
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Peter G SzilagyiDepartment of Pediatrics, UCLA Mattel Children's Hospital, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California, USA.
Rebecca ValderramaDepartment of Pediatrics, UCLA Mattel Children's Hospital, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California, USA.
Sitaram VangalaDepartment of Medicine Statistics Core, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California, Los Angeles, California, USA.
Christina AlbertinDepartment of Pediatrics, UCLA Mattel Children's Hospital, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California, USA.
David OkikawaDavid Geffen School of Medicine, University of California, Los Angeles, California, USA.
Michael SloyanDepartment of Information Services and Solutions, UCLA Health System, Los Angeles, California, USA.
Nathalie LopezDepartment of Pediatrics, UCLA Mattel Children's Hospital, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California, USA.
Carlos F LernerDepartment of Pediatrics, UCLA Mattel Children's Hospital, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California, USA.

Funding

Improving Influenza Vaccination Delivery Across a Health System by the Electronic Health Records Patient PortalR01AI135029 · NIAID · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA LOS ANGELES · PI SZILAGYI, PETER G · 2018 to 2022
$3.7M
Centralized IIS-Based Reminder-Recall to Increase Influenza Vaccination RatesR01AI114903 · NIAID · UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO DENVER · PI KEMPE, ALLISON, SZILAGYI, PETER G · 2015 to 2018
$2.8M
NIAID NIH HHS R01 AI114903NIAID NIH HHS R01 AI135029
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveThe study sought to assess, for children in one large health system, (1) characteristics of active users of the patient portal (≥1 use in prior 12 months), (2) portal use by adolescents, and (3) variations in pediatric patient portal use. MATERIALS AND

methodsWe analyzed data from the electronic health record regarding pediatric portal use during 2017-2018 across a health system (39 871 pediatric patients).

resultsAltogether, 63.5% of pediatric patients were active portal users. Children (proxies) who were boys, privately insured, white, and spoke English were more likely to be active users. Common uses involved messaging with physicians, medications, allergies, letters, and laboratory results. By 15 years of age, >50% of adolescents used the portal by themselves (without a proxy). Pediatric portal use varied widely across practices. DISCUSSION: Pediatric or adolescent portal use is quite high, but large variations exist.

conclusionUse of the portal for pediatric care may reflect varying pediatric patient engagement.

Indexed as

PediatricsAdolescentChildFemaleHumansLos AngelesMalePatient PortalsProxyhealth information technologypatient portalpediatrics

Identifiers

PMID31841146
PMCPMC7647250

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.