Computerizing NIAAA's Best Practices for Youth Screening and Brief Intervention: A Proof-of-Concept Pilot Study of an Automated Alcohol Screening and Intervention Resource Tool.

Steven B Carswell, Shannon G Mitchell, Jan Gryczynski, Elizabeth Lertch

Abstract read

In one paragraph

Article in Journal of drug education. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it

0cells of the map it votes in

1citing papers in PubMed

–field-weighted citation impact

1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

Digital Health Interventions to Enhance Prevention in Primary Care: Scoping Review.JMIR medical informatics · 2022
Article

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Steven B CarswellFriends Research Institute, Baltimore, MD, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-7437-2964

Shannon G MitchellFriends Research Institute, Baltimore, MD, USA.

Jan GryczynskiFriends Research Institute, Baltimore, MD, USA.

Elizabeth LertchFriends Research Institute, Baltimore, MD, USA.

Funding

Computerizing NIAAA's Best Practices for Youth Screening and Brief InterventionR41AA024354 · NIAAA · COG ANALYTICS, LLC · PI MITCHELL, SHANNON GWIN · 2016 to 2016

$199k

NIAAA NIH HHS R41 AA024354

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This article reports findings from formative research on translating key elements of the National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism (NIAAA) and American Academy of Pediatrics Practitioner's Guide for pediatric alcohol misuse to a computerized web- and mobile-compatible format with patient risk screening and tailored decision support content. Five practitioners at an urban primary care center used a prototype computerized version of the NIAAA/American Academy of Pediatrics Practitioner's Guide with 80 adolescent patients during routine health-care visits. Practitioners reported a high level of practitioner and adolescent patient engagement and satisfaction with the prototype. Study findings indicate that computerization of the NIAAA Practitioner's Guide is feasible and well accepted by providers and adolescent patients and could be useful for addressing alcohol misuse in primary care settings.

Indexed as

Computers, HandheldAdolescentAlcohol-Related DisordersChildFemaleHumansMaleMass ScreeningNational Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism (U.S.)Patient SatisfactionPractice Guidelines as TopicPrimary Health CareSurveys and QuestionnairesUnited Statesadolescentsalcohol misusepediatriciansprimary care settingsscreening and brief interventiontechnology-based interventions

Identifiers

PMID31841034

DOI10.1177/0047237919894960

PMCPMC13386547

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata

LicenceTDM

Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.