Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31841022›Full record

ArticleJournal of consulting and clinical psychology2020

Personalized prognostic prediction of treatment outcome for depressed patients in a naturalistic psychiatric hospital setting: A comparison of machine learning approaches.

Christian A Webb, Zachary D Cohen, Courtney Beard, Marie Forgeard, Andrew D Peckham, Thröstur Björgvinsson

Abstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of consulting and clinical psychology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 40 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
40citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

40 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Applying Artificial Intelligence to Expand the Measurement Tool Kit in Clinical-Psychological Science: Moving Beyond Self-Reports.Clinical psychological science : a journal of the Association for Psychological Science · 2026
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Individual-Specific Animated Profiles of Mental Health.Perspectives on psychological science : a journal of the Association for Psychological Science · 2025
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Christian A WebbDepartment of Psychiatry, Harvard Medical School/McLean Hospital.
Zachary D CohenDepartment of Psychology, University of California, Los Angeles.
Courtney BeardDepartment of Psychiatry, Harvard Medical School/McLean Hospital.
Marie ForgeardDepartment of Clinical Psychology, William James College.
Andrew D PeckhamDepartment of Psychiatry, Harvard Medical School/McLean Hospital.
Thröstur BjörgvinssonDepartment of Psychiatry, Harvard Medical School/McLean Hospital.

Funding

Predicting the onset of depression in at-risk adolescents from endophenotype profilesR01MH116969 · NIMH · MCLEAN HOSPITAL · PI WEBB, CHRISTIAN ANTHONY · 2019 to 2024
$2.8M
Examining Reward-Related Predictors and Mechanisms of Change in BA Treatment for Anhedonic AdolescentsK23MH108752 · NIMH · MCLEAN HOSPITAL · PI WEBB, CHRISTIAN ANTHONY · 2015 to 2018
$703k
Brain & Behavior Research FoundationMcLean HospitalMQ: Transforming mental health MQDS16/72NIMH NIH HHS K23 MH108752NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH116969Unnamed Funding Source
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveResearch on predictors of treatment outcome in depression has largely derived from randomized clinical trials involving strict standardization of treatments, stringent patient exclusion criteria, and careful selection and supervision of study clinicians. The extent to which findings from such studies generalize to naturalistic psychiatric settings is unclear. This study sought to predict depression outcomes for patients seeking treatment within an intensive psychiatric hospital setting and while comparing the performance of a range of machine learning approaches.

methodDepressed patients (N = 484; ages 18-72; 89% White) receiving treatment within a psychiatric partial hospital program delivering pharmacotherapy and cognitive behavioral therapy were split into a training sample and holdout sample. First, within the training sample, 51 pretreatment variables were submitted to 13 machine learning algorithms to predict, via cross-validation, posttreatment Patient Health Questionnaire-9 depression scores. Second, the best performing modeling approach (lowest mean squared error; MSE) from the training sample was selected to predict outcome in the holdout sample.

resultsThe best performing model in the training sample was elastic net regularization (ENR; MSE = 20.49, R2 = .28), which had comparable performance in the holdout sample (MSE = 11.26; R2 = .38). There were 14 pretreatment variables that predicted outcome. To demonstrate the translation of an ENR model to personalized prediction of treatment outcome, a patient-specific prognosis calculator is presented.

conclusionsInformed by pretreatment patient characteristics, such predictive models could be used to communicate prognosis to clinicians and to guide treatment planning. Identified predictors of poor prognosis may suggest important targets for intervention. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2019 APA, all rights reserved).

Indexed as

Hospitals, PsychiatricAdolescentAdultAgedAntidepressive AgentsCognitive Behavioral TherapyDepressive DisorderFemaleHumansMachine LearningMaleMiddle AgedPrecision MedicinePrognosisReproducibility of ResultsTreatment OutcomeAntidepressive Agents

Identifiers

PMID31841022
PMCPMC6924628

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.