ArticleJournal of clinical laboratory analysis2020
Evaluating hypercoagulability in new-onset systemic lupus erythematosus patients using thromboelastography.
Article in Journal of clinical laboratory analysis, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Lupus anticoagulant hypoprothrombinemia syndrome successfully treated with rituximab - case report.Thrombosis journal · 2026Article
- Evaluating hypercoagulability in new-onset systemic lupus erythematosus patients using thromboelastography.Journal of clinical laboratory analysis · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundThromboelastography (TEG) can reflect the coagulation status in vivo, from clot formation to clot lysis. In the present study, we aimed to evaluate the function of TEG in detecting coagulation in patients with SLE and sought to explore the correlation between clinical and laboratory data.
methodsA total of 41 patients with new-onset SLE who had not undergone treatment and 56 healthy controls were included. TEG and other laboratory tests were performed, and clinical data were collected.
resultsA significant difference in the TEG reaction time and TEG achievement of clot firmness was observed between the groups. Moreover, these parameters were correlated with the lupus anticoagulant levels, platelet count, 24-hour urinary total protein quantity, and systemic lupus erythematosus disease activity index.
conclusionOur study demonstrated the prospective value of TEG in evaluating hypercoagulability in patients with SLE.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.