ArticleESC heart failure2020
Systolic blood pressure, heart rate, and outcomes in patients with coronary disease and heart failure.
Article in ESC heart failure, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Blood Pressure Predicted From Artificial Intelligence Analysis of Retinal Images Correlates With Future Cardiovascular Events.JACC. Advances · 2024Article
- Association of severity and prognosis with elevated blood pressure and heart rate levels in patients with intracerebral hemorrhage.BMC neurology · 2023Article
- Effects of elevated systolic blood pressure on ischemic heart disease: a Burden of Proof study.Nature medicine · 2022Article
- Determinants of mortality among seniors acutely readmitted for heart failure: racial disparities and clinical correlations.Journal of geriatric cardiology : JGC · 2022Article
- Effect of Presence versus Absence of Hypertension on Admission Heart Rate-Associated Cardiovascular Risk in Patients with Acute Coronary Syndrome.International journal of hypertension · 2022Article
- Systolic blood pressure, heart rate, and outcomes in patients with coronary disease and heart failure.ESC heart failure · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
aimsData regarding the optimal systolic blood pressure (SBP) and heart rate (HR) for coronary artery disease (CAD) patients with hypertension and a history of heart failure (HF) are limited. Accordingly, using data from a large clinical trial, we investigated the association between SBP and heart rate and subsequent adverse outcomes in CAD patients with a history of HF, and we aimed to better understand how pre-existing HF impacts outcomes among patients with CAD. METHODS AND
resultsAmong 22 576 CAD patients enrolled in the INternational VErapamil SR-Trandolapril STudy (INVEST), 1256 were identified with a history of physician-diagnosed HF New York Heart Association (NYHA) Class 1-3 at entry. The primary outcome was the first occurrence of all-cause death, myocardial infarction (MI), or stroke. Cox proportional-hazards models adjusted for pre-specified covariates were constructed to estimate risk among the HF cohort compared with a case-matched sample from the non-HF cohort. At a mean 2.5 years' follow-up, those with prior HF had a higher risk of the primary outcome (hazard ratio (HR) 2.55, 95% confidence interval 2.30-2.83, P < 0.0001). Among those with history of HF, a low (<120 mmHg) or high (>140 mmHg) SBP and heart rate ≥ 85 b.p.m. were associated with increased risk for adverse outcomes, which persisted after covariate adjustment.
conclusionsIn patients with CAD, a physician diagnosis of HF at baseline portended a higher risk for death, MI, or stroke than in those without an HF history. Achieving SBP of 120-140 mmHg and heart rate < 85 b.p.m. was associated with a better outcome in patients with known HF and CAD.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.