Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31840320›Full record

ArticleProtein science : a publication of the Protein Society2020

Design and structure of two new protein cages illustrate successes and ongoing challenges in protein engineering.

Kevin A Cannon, Rachel U Park, Scott E Boyken, Una Nattermann, Sue Yi, David Baker, Neil P King, Todd O Yeates

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Protein science : a publication of the Protein Society, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. X-ray crystal structure of a designed rigidified imaging scaffold in the ligand-free conformation.Acta crystallographica. Section F, Structural biology communications · 2024
    Article
  4. Article
  5. An interaction network approach predicts protein cage architectures in bionanotechnology.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2023
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Cryo-EM structure determination of small therapeutic protein targets at 3 Å-resolution using a rigid imaging scaffold.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2023
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Design, synthesis, and characterization of protein origami based on self-assembly of a brick and staple artificial protein pair.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2023
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. De novo designed protein inhibitors of amyloid aggregation and seeding.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2022
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Protein Assembly by Design.Chemical reviews · 2021
    Review
  17. Article
  18. Artificial Organelles: Towards Adding or Restoring Intracellular Activity.Chembiochem : a European journal of chemical biology · 2021
    Review
  19. Review
  20. Engineering spatiotemporal organization and dynamics in synthetic cells.Wiley interdisciplinary reviews. Nanomedicine and nanobiotechnology · 2021
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Kevin A CannonUCLA-DOE Institute for Genomics and Proteomics, Los Angeles, California.
Rachel U ParkUniversity of Washington Institute for Protein Design, Seattle, Washington.
Scott E BoykenUniversity of Washington Institute for Protein Design, Seattle, Washington.
Una NattermannUniversity of Washington Institute for Protein Design, Seattle, Washington.
Sue YiUniversity of Washington Institute for Protein Design, Seattle, Washington.
David BakerUniversity of Washington Institute for Protein Design, Seattle, Washington.
Neil P KingUniversity of Washington Institute for Protein Design, Seattle, Washington.
Todd O YeatesUCLA-DOE Institute for Genomics and Proteomics, Los Angeles, California.ORCID 0000-0001-5709-9839

Funding

User Training and OutreachP30GM124165 · NIGMS · CORNELL UNIVERSITY · PI MALCOLM S. CAPEL · 2018 to 2026
$34.2M
TRAINING IN MOLECULAR AND CELLULAR BIOLOGYT32GM007270 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI RAIBLE, DAVID W · 1985 to 2020
$21.0M
Virus TransmissionP50AI150464 · NIAID · UNIVERSITY OF UTAH · PI HOPE, THOMAS · 2019 to 2021
$14.9M
Pixel Array Detector for X-ray CrystallographyS10RR029205 · NCRR · CORNELL UNIVERSITY · PI EALICK, STEVEN E · 2010 to 2010
$1.8M
Howard Hughes Medical InstituteNCRR NIH HHS S10 RR029205NIAID NIH HHS P50 AI150464NIGMS NIH HHS P30 GM124165NIGMS NIH HHS T32 GM007270
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In recent years, new protein engineering methods have produced more than a dozen symmetric, self-assembling protein cages whose structures have been validated to match their design models with near-atomic accuracy. However, many protein cage designs that are tested in the lab do not form the desired assembly, and improving the success rate of design has been a point of recent emphasis. Here we present two protein structures solved by X-ray crystallography of designed protein oligomers that form two-component cages with tetrahedral symmetry. To improve on the past tendency toward poorly soluble protein, we used a computational protocol that favors the formation of hydrogen-bonding networks over exclusively hydrophobic interactions to stabilize the designed protein-protein interfaces. Preliminary characterization showed highly soluble expression, and solution studies indicated successful cage formation by both designed proteins. For one of the designs, a crystal structure confirmed at high resolution that the intended tetrahedral cage was formed, though several flipped amino acid side chain rotamers resulted in an interface that deviates from the precise hydrogen-bonding pattern that was intended. A structure of the other designed cage showed that, under the conditions where crystals were obtained, a noncage structure was formed wherein a porous 3D protein network in space group I2

Indexed as

Protein EngineeringComputational BiologyCrystallography, X-RayHydrogen BondingModels, MolecularProtein ConformationProteinsProteinscomputational biologynanotechnologyprotein assemblyprotein cagesprotein crystallographyprotein design

Identifiers

PMID31840320
PMCPMC7096701

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.