Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31840113›Full record

ArticleHeliyon2019

A novel subunit vaccine based on the viral protein 2 of porcine parvovirus: safety profile in bred pigs at different stages of the reproduction cycle and in offspring.

Beatriz Garcia-Morante, Marta Noguera, Sonja Klocke, Kathrin Sommer, Troy Kaiser, Verena Haist, Holger Schmidt, Philip Bridger

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Heliyon, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
0.7field-weighted citation impact, top 30% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Beatriz Garcia-MoranteCentcinc Coworking, C/, Montserrat de Casanovas 105, 08032, Barcelona, Spain.
Marta NogueraBoehringer Ingelheim Veterinary, Research Center GmbH & Co. KG, Bemeroder Straβe 31, 30559, Hannover, Germany.
Sonja KlockeBoehringer Ingelheim Veterinary, Research Center GmbH & Co. KG, Bemeroder Straβe 31, 30559, Hannover, Germany.
Kathrin SommerBoehringer Ingelheim Veterinary, Research Center GmbH & Co. KG, Bemeroder Straβe 31, 30559, Hannover, Germany.
Troy KaiserBoehringer Ingelheim Vetmedica Inc., 2621 North Belt Highway, 64506, St. Joseph, MO, USA.
Verena HaistBoehringer Ingelheim Veterinary, Research Center GmbH & Co. KG, Bemeroder Straβe 31, 30559, Hannover, Germany.
Holger SchmidtBioMedVet Research GmbH, Südkampen 31, 29664, Walsrode, Germany.
Philip BridgerBoehringer Ingelheim Veterinary, Research Center GmbH & Co. KG, Bemeroder Straβe 31, 30559, Hannover, Germany.
Boehringer Ingelheim (Germany) · DEBoehringer Ingelheim (United States) · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Porcine parvovirus 1 (PPV1) viral protein (VP) 2 is the primary antigen responsible for inducing specific protective immunity, so it is a desirable target for development of recombinant subunit vaccines to prevent PPV1 disease. The objective of this study was to evaluate repeated doses of a novel VP2-based PPV1 subunit vaccine, namely ReproCyc® ParvoFLEX, for safety in bred pigs and in offspring under experimental settings. Therefore, the investigation of safety at all breeding stages was evaluated in four independent studies involving: pre-breeding gilts (study A), breeding-age gilts and boars (study B), early and late gestating sows and offspring (study C) and lactating sows and offspring (study D). In all four studies, animals were free from PPV1 based on serology and PCR prior to inclusion. All studies comprised one or two vaccinated groups that received the PPV1 subunit vaccine and a negative control group. Thus, safety was established due to the lack of significant differences between the vaccinated groups and the corresponding unvaccinated (negative control) groups. Gilts, sows and boars were evaluated for local and systemic reactions after vaccination as well as for reproductive performance. The survival rate and average daily weight gain (ADWG) from birth to weaning in offspring was evaluated in studies C and D. Additionally, serology was determined in studies A, C and D. The vaccine was shown to be safe with no relevant significant differences between vaccinated and unvaccinated groups in any experiment. Therefore, repeated doses of ReproCyc® ParvoFLEX were safe in target animals at different stages of the reproductive cycle and in offspring, placing this vaccine as a suitable candidate for mass vaccination programs in breeding herds.

Indexed as

Animal scienceInfectious diseaseMass vaccinationMicrobiologyPigsPorcine parvovirus 1Subunit vaccineVaccinesVaccine safetyVeterinary medicineVirology

Identifiers

PMID31840113
PMCPMC6893071
OpenAlexW2985817151

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.