ArticleBiomedical reports2020
Modulatory effect of laser irradiation on mastoparan-7-induced contraction.
Article in Biomedical reports, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.
- Non-Excitatory Amino Acids, Melatonin, and Free Radicals: Examining the Role in Stroke and Aging.Antioxidants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Mastoparan-7 activates guanine nucleotide-binding proteins (G-proteins) and stimulates both apoptosis and increases in cytoplasmic calcium concentration and may induce smooth muscle contraction. The primary aim of the present study was to evaluate the modulatory effect of laser stimulation on vascular smooth muscle contraction induced by direct stimulation of G-protein with mastoparan-7. Experiments were performed on isolated and perfused tail arteries of Wistar rats. Contraction force in the model was measured by increased levels of perfusion pressure with a constant flow. Irradiation treatment was applied directly to the blood vessels. The laser was applied in increasing doses of 10 mW (E=1.8 J), 30 mW (E=5.5 J) and 110 mW (E=19.8 J). Time of exposure was 3 min for each irradiation. In the laser-stimulated arteries, a significant and dose-dependent decrease was observed. The half maximal effective concentration values were 4.43±2.2x10
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.