Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31839758›Full record

ArticleDose-response : a publication of International Hormesis Society

The Cell Cycle G2/M Block Is an Indicator of Cellular Radiosensitivity.

Chang Liu, Jing Nie, Rensheng Wang, Weidong Mao

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Dose-response : a publication of International Hormesis Society. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed
2.6field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed, 30 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Targeting PLK1 Reduces MMP10 to Enhance Radiosensitivity in HPV- Head and Neck Cancer.Clinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research · 2026
    Article
  4. Role of Different Enzymes in HInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2025
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. 6-Biomedicines · 2024
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Chang LiuDepartment of Radiotherapy, the First Affiliated Hospital of Guangxi Medical University, Nanning, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7047-4901
Jing NieState Key Laboratory of Radiation Medicine and Protection, School of Radiation Medicine and Protection, Medical College of Soochow University, Suzhou, China.
Rensheng WangDepartment of Radiotherapy, the First Affiliated Hospital of Guangxi Medical University, Nanning, China.
Weidong MaoState Key Laboratory of Radiation Medicine and Protection, School of Radiation Medicine and Protection, Medical College of Soochow University, Suzhou, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6880-7148
Guangxi Medical University · CNSoochow University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundDetermination of the radiosensitivity of a specific tumor is essential to its precision tumor radiotherapy, but the measurement of cellular radiosensitivity with a routine colony forming assay is both labor- and time-consuming. An alternative option allowing rapid and precise prediction of radiosensitivity is necessary.

methodsIn this study, we exposed 4 in vitro cultured cell lines to various doses of X-rays or carbon ions and then measured their radiosensitivities with a routine colony-forming assay, and monitored the kinetics of cell cycle distribution with routine propidium iodine staining and flow cytometry.

resultsBased on the results, we correlated cellular radiosensitivity with a dynamic assay of cell cycle distribution, specifically, the negative correlation of cellular radiosensitivity with the accumulated G2/M arrested cells at 48 hours after exposure. The higher the proportion of accumulated G2/M arrested cells at 48 hours after exposure, the lower the radiosensitivity of the cell line, that is, the higher radioresistance of the cell line.

conclusionThese findings provide an optional application of regular cell cycle analysis for the prediction of tumor radiosensitivity.

Indexed as

G2/M blockionizing radiationmelanoma and squamous cell carcinomaprecision medicineradiosensitivity

Identifiers

PMID31839758
PMCPMC6902394
OpenAlexW2995069420

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.