Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31839521›Full record

Observational studyThe American journal of emergency medicine2020

Validation of the Elderly Risk Assessment Index in the Emergency Department.

Nataly R Espinoza Suarez, Laura E Walker, Molly M Jeffery, Jessica A Stanich, Ronna L Campbell, Christine M Lohse, Paul Y Takahashi, Fernanda Bellolio

Abstract readObservational StudyValidation Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in The American journal of emergency medicine, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Nataly R Espinoza SuarezDepartment of Emergency Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.
Laura E WalkerDepartment of Emergency Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.
Molly M JefferyDepartment of Emergency Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA; Department Health Science Research, Division of Health Care Policy and Research, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.
Jessica A StanichDepartment of Emergency Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.
Ronna L CampbellDepartment of Emergency Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.
Christine M LohseDepartment of Biostatistics and Informatics, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.
Paul Y TakahashiDepartment of Internal Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.
Fernanda BellolioDepartment of Emergency Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA; Department Health Science Research, Division of Health Care Policy and Research, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA. Electronic address: bellolio.fernanda@mayo.edu.

Funding

Mayo Clinic Center for Translational Science ActivitiesUL1TR000135 · NCATS · MAYO CLINIC ROCHESTER · PI KHOSLA, SUNDEEP · 2012 to 2015
$41.2M
NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR000135
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesThe Elderly Risk Assessment (ERA) score is a validated index for primary care patients that predict hospitalizations, mortality, and Emergency Department (ED) visits. The score incorporates age, prior hospital days, marital status, and comorbidities. Our aim was to validate the ERA score in ED patients.

methodsObservational cohort study of patients age ≥ 60 presenting to an academic ED over a 1-year period. Regression analyses were performed for associations with outcomes (hospitalization, return visits and death). Medians, interquartile range (IQR), odds ratios (OR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) were calculated.

resultsThe cohort included 27,397 visits among 18,607 patients. Median age 74 years (66-82), 48% were female and 59% were married. Patients from 54% of visits were admitted to the hospital, 16% returned to the ED within 30 days, and 18% died within one year. Higher ERA scores were associated with: hospital admission (score 10 [4-16] vs 5 [1-11], p < 0.0001), return visits (11 [5-17] vs 7 [2-13], p < 0.0001); and death within one year (14 [7-20] vs 6 [2-13], p < 0.0001). Patients with ERA score ≥ 16 were more likely to be admitted to the hospital, OR 2.14 (2.02-2.28, p < 0.0001), return within 30 days OR 1.99 (1.85-2.14), and to die within a year, OR 2.69 (2.54-2.85).

conclusionThe ERA score can be automatically calculated within the electronic health record and helps identify patients at increased risk of death, hospitalization and return ED visits. The ERA score can be applied to ED patients, and may help prognosticate the need for advanced care planning.

Indexed as

Emergency Service, HospitalGeriatric AssessmentRisk AssessmentAgedAged, 80 and overCohort StudiesFemaleHumansMaleMinnesotaMortalityPatient AdmissionAgedDelivery of healthcareElderlyEmergency DepartmentEmergency servicesHealthcare useOlder adultsValidation

Identifiers

PMID31839521
PMCPMC7280072

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.