Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31839144›Full record

SynthesisThe Lancet. Global health2020

Safety of oral ivermectin during pregnancy: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Patricia Nicolas, Marta F Maia, Quique Bassat, Kevin C Kobylinski, Wuelton Monteiro, N Regina Rabinovich, Clara Menéndez, Azucena Bardají, Carlos Chaccour

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in The Lancet. Global health, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04703205 (A Placebo-controlled, Randomized, Double-blind Study in COvid-19 Patients With iveRmectin; An inVEstigator iniTiaTEd Trial), which is not on this map. Cited by 46 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
46citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
15.5field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT04703205 phase2unknown statusnot on this map

A Placebo-controlled, Randomized, Double-blind Study in COvid-19 Patients With iveRmectin; An inVEstigator iniTiaTEd Trial

TypeinterventionalSponsorKitasato UniversityRan2020 to 2022Enrolled214ConditionsCovid19ArmsIvermectin 3 MG, Placebo
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

46 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 116 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Ivermectin treatment in humans for reducing malaria transmission.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2021
    Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 7 institutions in 8 countries.

Patricia NicolasISGlobal, Hospital Clínic-Universitat de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain; Centro de Investigação em Saúde de Manhiça, Maputo, Mozambique.
Marta F MaiaDepartment of Biosciences, KEMRI Wellcome Trust Research Programme, Kilifi, Kenya; Nuffield Department of Medicine, Centre for Tropical Medicine and Global Health, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.
Quique BassatISGlobal, Hospital Clínic-Universitat de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain; Centro de Investigação em Saúde de Manhiça, Maputo, Mozambique; ICREA, Barcelona, Spain; Pediatric Infectious Diseases Unit, Pediatrics Department, Hospital Sant Joan de Déu, University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain.
Kevin C KobylinskiArmed Forces Research Institute of Medical Sciences, Bangkok, Thailand.
Wuelton MonteiroFundação de Medicina Tropical Dr Heitor Vieira Dourado, Manaus, Amazonas, Brazil; Escola Superior de Ciências da Saúde, Universidade do Estado do Amazonas, Manaus, Amazonas, Brazil.
N Regina RabinovichISGlobal, Hospital Clínic-Universitat de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain; Harvard T H Chan School of Public Health, Harvard University, Boston, MA, USA.
Clara MenéndezISGlobal, Hospital Clínic-Universitat de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain; Centro de Investigação em Saúde de Manhiça, Maputo, Mozambique.
Azucena BardajíISGlobal, Hospital Clínic-Universitat de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain; Centro de Investigação em Saúde de Manhiça, Maputo, Mozambique.
Carlos ChaccourISGlobal, Hospital Clínic-Universitat de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain; Centro de Investigação em Saúde de Manhiça, Maputo, Mozambique; Department of Environmental Health and Ecological Sciences, Ifakara Health Institute, Ifakara, Tanzania; Vector Control Group, Instituto de Medicina Tropical Universidad de Navarra, Pamplona, Spain. Electronic address: carlos.chaccour@isglobal.org.
Manhiça Health Research Centre · MZArmed Forces Research Institute of Medical Science · THBarcelona Institute for Global Health · ESHarvard University · USUniversidade do Estado do Amazonas · BRUniversitat de Barcelona · ESUniversity of Oxford · GB

Funding

Wellcome Trust 203077
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAbout 3·7 billion doses of ivermectin have been distributed in mass drug administration (MDA) campaigns globally over the past 30 years. At 10-100 times higher than current human doses, ivermectin is a known teratogen in mammals. During these campaigns with recommended doses, pregnant women might be inadvertently exposed. We therefore aimed to evaluate the existing evidence for serious and non-serious adverse events after ivermectin exposure in pregnant women.

methodsFor this systematic review and meta-analysis, we searched relevant databases and trial registry platforms on July 15, 2018, for randomised controlled trials (RCTs) and observational studies that reported adverse events in pregnant women. We did not use language or date restrictions. Outcomes of interest were spontaneous abortions, stillbirths, congenital anomalies, and neonatal death (serious adverse events), as well as maternal morbidity, preterm births, and low birthweight (adverse events). The risk of bias was assessed using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale for observational studies and the Cochrane Risk of Bias Tool for RCTs. We did the meta-analysis of observational studies and RCTs separately. The quality of evidence was assessed using the GRADE approach. The study protocol is registered with PROSPERO, protocol CRD42016046914.

findingsWe identified 147 records, of which only five observational studies and one RCT were included for quantitative analysis; these studies were published between 1990 and 2008, and were done in six African countries. 893 women with 899 pregancy outcomes were included, of whom 496 pregnant women (500 pregnancy outcomes) received ivermectin inadvertently during MDA campaigns in the observational studies and 397 pregnant women (399 pregnancy outcomes) purposely received ivermectin as part of the open-label RCT. No study reported neonatal deaths, maternal morbidity, preterm births, or low birthweight. It is unclear whether exposure to ivermectin during pregnancy increases the risk of spontaneous abortions and stillbirths (odds ratio [OR] 1·15 [95% CI 0·75-1·78] with very low certainty of evidence for the four observational studies and 0·62 [0·18-2·14] with very low certainty of evidence for the RCT) or congenital anomalies (OR 1·69 [95% CI 0·83-3·41] with very low certainty of evidence for the five observational studies and 1·10 [0·07-17·65] with very low certainty of evidence for the RCT).

interpretationThere is insufficient evidence to conclude on the safety profile of ivermectin during pregnancy. Treatment campaigns should focus additional efforts on preventing inadvertent treatment of pregnant women.

fundingUnitaid.

Indexed as

Pregnant PeopleAdministration, OralAdultFemaleHumansIvermectinPregnancyPregnancy ComplicationsPregnancy OutcomeTeratogensIvermectinTeratogens

Identifiers

PMID31839144
PMCPMC7613514
OpenAlexW2995527246

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.