SynthesisThe Lancet. Global health2020
Safety of oral ivermectin during pregnancy: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Synthesis in The Lancet. Global health, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04703205 (A Placebo-controlled, Randomized, Double-blind Study in COvid-19 Patients With iveRmectin; An inVEstigator iniTiaTEd Trial), which is not on this map. Cited by 46 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
A Placebo-controlled, Randomized, Double-blind Study in COvid-19 Patients With iveRmectin; An inVEstigator iniTiaTEd Trial
Who cites it
46 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 116 citations in OpenAlex.
- Systematic review to evaluate a potential association between helminth infection and physical stunting in children.Parasites & vectors · 2022Pooled it
- Ivermectin treatment in humans for reducing malaria transmission.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2021Pooled it
- Ivermectin for Prevention and Treatment of COVID-19 Infection: A Systematic Review, Meta-analysis, and Trial Sequential Analysis to Inform Clinical Guidelines.American journal of therapeutics · 2021Pooled it
- Time trends in the burden of scabies from 1990 to 2021, and projections to 2050: Insights based on the Global Burden of Disease Study 2021.PLoS neglected tropical diseases · 2026Article
- Risk of adverse pregnancy outcomes following inadvertent exposure to ivermectin during the periconception period: findings from two cluster-randomized trials in Mozambique and Kenya.EClinicalMedicine · 2026Article
- Selection of the optimal long-acting injectable formulation of ivermectin for use in humans to target malaria vectors in Western Africa: evaluation of pharmacokinetics and mosquitocidal efficacy in cattle under laboratory conditions.Parasites & vectors · 2026Article
- Ivermectin exposition during neurulation induces neural tube defects and neuromuscular alterations inFrontiers in pharmacology · 2026Article
- Physiological and Biochemical Responses to Repeated Administration of Ivermectin in Rabbits.F1000Research · 2026Article
- Performance of novel onchocerciasis rapid diagnostic tests in a field setting in South Sudan.PLoS neglected tropical diseases · 2025Article
- Community-directed treatment with ivermectin in Maridi, South Sudan: Impact of an onchocerciasis awareness campaign and bi-annual treatment on therapeutic coverage.PLoS neglected tropical diseases · 2025Article
- Diversity and Prevalence of Helminths and Protozoa Among Pregnant Women in Tropical Ecuador: Implications for Chemotherapy.The American journal of tropical medicine and hygiene · 2025Article
- Economic Evaluation of Oral Ivermectin, Alone or in Combination with Permethrin, versus Permethrin, in the Treatment of Classic Scabies in the Philippine Setting.Acta medica Philippina · 2025Article
- Clinical practice guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of scabies.International journal of dermatology · 2024Review
- Crystal structure of N-terminally hexahistidine-tagged Onchocerca volvulus macrophage migration inhibitory factor-1.Acta crystallographica. Section F, Structural biology communications · 2024Article
- Pharmacometrics to Evaluate Dosing of the Patient-Friendly Ivermectin CHILD-IVITAB in Children ≥ 15 kg and <15 kg.Pharmaceutics · 2024Article
- Scabies vaccines: where we stand and challenges ahead.Parasitology research · 2024Review
- ACV with/without IVM: a new talk on intestinal CDX2 and muscular CD34 and Cyclin D1 duringHelminthologia · 2024Article
- Human strongyloidiasis: complexities and pathways forward.Clinical microbiology reviews · 2023Review
- Synthesis of findings from the literature and a qualitative research study on the impacts of gender, disability, and ethnicity in Neglected Tropical Diseases programs.PLoS neglected tropical diseases · 2023Review
- Non-adherence to ivermectin in onchocerciasis-endemic communities with persistent infection in the Bono Region of Ghana: a mixed-methods study.BMC infectious diseases · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
- Commented on by
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
9 authors at 7 institutions in 8 countries.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundAbout 3·7 billion doses of ivermectin have been distributed in mass drug administration (MDA) campaigns globally over the past 30 years. At 10-100 times higher than current human doses, ivermectin is a known teratogen in mammals. During these campaigns with recommended doses, pregnant women might be inadvertently exposed. We therefore aimed to evaluate the existing evidence for serious and non-serious adverse events after ivermectin exposure in pregnant women.
methodsFor this systematic review and meta-analysis, we searched relevant databases and trial registry platforms on July 15, 2018, for randomised controlled trials (RCTs) and observational studies that reported adverse events in pregnant women. We did not use language or date restrictions. Outcomes of interest were spontaneous abortions, stillbirths, congenital anomalies, and neonatal death (serious adverse events), as well as maternal morbidity, preterm births, and low birthweight (adverse events). The risk of bias was assessed using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale for observational studies and the Cochrane Risk of Bias Tool for RCTs. We did the meta-analysis of observational studies and RCTs separately. The quality of evidence was assessed using the GRADE approach. The study protocol is registered with PROSPERO, protocol CRD42016046914.
findingsWe identified 147 records, of which only five observational studies and one RCT were included for quantitative analysis; these studies were published between 1990 and 2008, and were done in six African countries. 893 women with 899 pregancy outcomes were included, of whom 496 pregnant women (500 pregnancy outcomes) received ivermectin inadvertently during MDA campaigns in the observational studies and 397 pregnant women (399 pregnancy outcomes) purposely received ivermectin as part of the open-label RCT. No study reported neonatal deaths, maternal morbidity, preterm births, or low birthweight. It is unclear whether exposure to ivermectin during pregnancy increases the risk of spontaneous abortions and stillbirths (odds ratio [OR] 1·15 [95% CI 0·75-1·78] with very low certainty of evidence for the four observational studies and 0·62 [0·18-2·14] with very low certainty of evidence for the RCT) or congenital anomalies (OR 1·69 [95% CI 0·83-3·41] with very low certainty of evidence for the five observational studies and 1·10 [0·07-17·65] with very low certainty of evidence for the RCT).
interpretationThere is insufficient evidence to conclude on the safety profile of ivermectin during pregnancy. Treatment campaigns should focus additional efforts on preventing inadvertent treatment of pregnant women.
fundingUnitaid.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.