ArticleThe Lancet. Global health2020
Correction to: Exposure to improved nutrition from conception to age 2 years and adult cardiometabolic disease risk: misclassification of 31 individuals.
Article in The Lancet. Global health, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- The Potential Physiologic Mechanisms by Which Early-Life Nutrition May Influence Type 2 Diabetes Pathophysiology in Humans.Annual review of nutrition · 2026Review
- Epigenetic age and cardiometabolic disease in Guatemalan adults: a cross-sectional analysis.Journal of health, population, and nutrition · 2026Article
- Early-life nutrition supplementation and epigenetic age in middle-adulthood among Guatemalan adults.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
- Erratum for
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.
Identifiers
31839139What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.