Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31839018›Full record

ArticleEpidemiology and psychiatric sciences2019

Household economic burden and outcomes of patients with schizophrenia after being unlocked and treated in rural China.

L Xu, T Xu, W Tan, B Yan, D Wang, H Li, Y Lin, K Li, H Wen, X Qin and 5 more

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Epidemiology and psychiatric sciences, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
1.6field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 19 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors at 6 institutions in 2 countries.

L XuPeking University Sixth Hospital, Peking University Institute of Mental Health, NHC Key Laboratory of Mental Health (Peking University), National Clinical Research Center for Mental Disorders (Peking University Sixth Hospital), CN 100191, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7861-9063
T XuPeking University Sixth Hospital, Peking University Institute of Mental Health, NHC Key Laboratory of Mental Health (Peking University), National Clinical Research Center for Mental Disorders (Peking University Sixth Hospital), CN 100191, China.
W TanGuangdong General Hospital, Guangdong Mental Health Center, Guangzhou, Guangdong, CN, China.
B YanHebei Sixth People's Hospital, Heibei Institute of Mental Health, Baoding, Hebei, CN, China.
D WangThe Third People's Hospital of Mianyang, Sichuan Mental Health Center, Mianyang, Sichuan, CN, China.
H LiDepartment of Prevention and Control, The Fourth People's Hospital of Chengdu, Chengdu, Sichuan, CN, China.
Y LinGuangdong General Hospital, Guangdong Mental Health Center, Guangzhou, Guangdong, CN, China.
K LiHebei Sixth People's Hospital, Heibei Institute of Mental Health, Baoding, Hebei, CN, China.
H WenThe Third People's Hospital of Mianyang, Sichuan Mental Health Center, Mianyang, Sichuan, CN, China.
X QinDepartment of Prevention and Control, The Fourth People's Hospital of Chengdu, Chengdu, Sichuan, CN, China.
X SunHebei Sixth People's Hospital, Heibei Institute of Mental Health, Baoding, Hebei, CN, China.
L GuanPeking University Sixth Hospital, Peking University Institute of Mental Health, NHC Key Laboratory of Mental Health (Peking University), National Clinical Research Center for Mental Disorders (Peking University Sixth Hospital), CN 100191, China.
J K BassDepartment of Mental Health, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5192-628X
H MaPeking University Sixth Hospital, Peking University Institute of Mental Health, NHC Key Laboratory of Mental Health (Peking University), National Clinical Research Center for Mental Disorders (Peking University Sixth Hospital), CN 100191, China.
X YuPeking University Sixth Hospital, Peking University Institute of Mental Health, NHC Key Laboratory of Mental Health (Peking University), National Clinical Research Center for Mental Disorders (Peking University Sixth Hospital), CN 100191, China.
Peking University · CNHebei Mental Health Center · CNGuangdong General Hospital · CNMianyang Third People's Hospital · CNThe Fourth People's Hospital · CNJohns Hopkins University · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aimsPatients with severe mental disorders in low-resource settings have limited access to services, resulting in overwhelming caregiving burden for families. In extreme cases, this has led to the long-term restraining of patients in their homes. China underwent a nationwide initiative to unlock patients and provide continued treatment. This study aims to quantify household economic burden in families after unlocking and treatment, and to identify factors associated with increased burden due to schizophrenia.

methodsA total of 264 subjects were enrolled from three geographically diverse provinces in 2012. Subjects were patients with schizophrenia who were previously put under restraints and had participated in the 'unlocking and treatment' intervention. The primary outcome was the current household economic burden, obtained from past year financial information collected through on-site interview. Patient disease characteristics, treatment, outcomes and family caregiving burden were collected as well. Univariate and multivariate linear regression were used to construct risk factor models for indirect economic burden.

resultsAfter participating in the intervention, 85% of patients continued to receive mental health services, 70% used medication as prescribed and 80% were never relocked. Family members reported significantly decreased caregiving burden after receiving the intervention. Mean direct and indirect household economic burdens were CNY963 (US$31.7) and CNY11 724 (US$1670) per year, respectively, while family total income was on average CNY12 108 (US$1913) per year. Greater disease severity and poorer patient psychosocial function at time of study were found to be independent factors related to increased indirect burden.

conclusionsThe 'unlocking and treatment' intervention has improved the lives of patients and families. Indirect burden due to disease is still a major economic issue that needs to be addressed, potentially through improving treatment and patient functioning. Our findings contribute to the unravelling and eventual elimination of chronic restraining of mentally ill patients in low-resource settings.

Indexed as

Cost of IllnessHealth Care CostsHealth ExpendituresAdolescentAdultCaregiversChinaFemaleHumansMaleMental Health ServicesMiddle AgedSchizophreniaSchizophrenic PsychologySurveys and QuestionnairesYoung AdultEconomic issuesfamilieshealth service researchrisk factorsschizophrenia

Identifiers

PMID31839018
PMCPMC8061248
OpenAlexW2996757178

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.