Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31838745›Full record

ArticleMedical physics2020

Experimental investigation of neural network estimator and transfer learning techniques for K-edge spectral CT imaging.

Kevin C Zimmerman, Gayatri Sharma, Abdul Kareem Parchur, Amit Joshi, Taly Gilat Schmidt

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Medical physics, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 27% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 19 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Systematic Review on Learning-based Spectral CT.IEEE transactions on radiation and plasma medical sciences · 2024
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Spectral Photon Counting CT: Imaging Algorithms and Performance Assessment.IEEE transactions on radiation and plasma medical sciences · 2021
    Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Kevin C ZimmermanDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Marquette University, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, WI, 53233, USA.
Gayatri SharmaDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Marquette University, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, WI, 53233, USA.
Abdul Kareem ParchurDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Marquette University, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, WI, 53233, USA.
Amit JoshiDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Marquette University, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, WI, 53233, USA.
Taly Gilat SchmidtDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Marquette University, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, WI, 53233, USA.
Marquette University · US

Funding

Advancing energy-resolved CT systems for imaging K-edge contrast agentsR21EB015094 · NIBIB · MARQUETTE UNIVERSITY · PI SCHMIDT, TALY GILAT · 2013 to 2014
$390k
NIBIB NIH HHS R21 EB015094NIH HHS R21EB015094
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeSpectral computed tomography (CT) material decomposition algorithms require accurate physics-based models or empirically derived models. This study investigates a machine learning algorithm and transfer learning techniques for Spectral CT imaging of K-edge contrast agents using simulated and experimental measurements.

methodsA feed forward multilayer perceptron was implemented and trained on data acquired using a step wedge phantom containing acrylic, aluminum, and gadolinium materials. The neural network estimator was evaluated by scanning a rod phantom with varying dilutions of gadolinium oxide nanoparticles and by scanning a rat leg specimen with injected nanoparticles on a bench-top photon-counting computed tomography system. The algorithm decomposed each spectral projection measurement into path lengths of acrylic and aluminum and mass lengths of gadolinium. Each basis material sinogram was reconstructed into basis material images using filtered backprojection. Machine learning techniques of data standardization, transfer learning from aggregated pixel data, and transfer learning from simulations were investigated to improve image quality. The algorithm was compared to a previously published empirical method based on a linear approximation and calibration error look-up tables.

resultsThe combined transfer learning techniques did not improve quantification in the rod phantom and provided only a small qualitative improvement in ring artifacts. Transfer learning from aggregated pixel data and from simulations improved the qualitative image quality of the rat specimen, for which the calibration data were limited. Transfer learning from aggregated pixel data and simulations estimated 3.26, 6.26, and 12.45 mg/mL Gd concentrations compared to true 2.72, 5.44, and 10.88 mg/mL concentrations in the rod phantom. Additionally, the neural networks were able to separate the soft tissue, bone, and gadolinium nanoparticles of the ex vivo rat leg specimen into the different basis images.

conclusionsThe results demonstrate that empirical K-edge imaging from calibration measurements using machine learning and transfer learning is possible without explicit models of material attenuations, incident spectra, or the detector response.

Indexed as

Nerve NetTomography, X-Ray ComputedAnimalsGadoliniumImage Processing, Computer-AssistedNanoparticlesPhantoms, ImagingRatsGadoliniumgadolinium oxidecontrast agentmachine learningmaterial decompositionphoton-countingspectral CT

Identifiers

PMID31838745
PMCPMC7747865
OpenAlexW2996406547

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.