Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31838729›Full record

ArticleJournal of cancer education : the official journal of the American Association for Cancer Education2021

Race and Gender Differences in Awareness of Colorectal Cancer Screening Tests and Guidelines Among Recently Diagnosed Colon Cancer Patients in an Urban Setting.

Leslie R Carnahan, Lindsey Jones, Katherine C Brewer, Elizabeth A Watts, Caryn E Peterson, Carol Estwing Ferrans, Toni Cipriano-Steffens, Blase Polite, Ajay V Maker, Rozina Chowdhery and 2 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of cancer education : the official journal of the American Association for Cancer Education, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Personalizing cancer risk: a systematic review of risk communication strategies.Journal of cancer research and clinical oncology · 2026
    Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Beliefs Underlying Colorectal Cancer Information Seeking Among Young Black Adults: a Reasoned Action Approach Elicitation Study.Journal of cancer education : the official journal of the American Association for Cancer Education · 2023
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Leslie R CarnahanCenter for Research on Women and Gender, College of Medicine, University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA. lcarna2@uic.edu.ORCID 0000-0002-5813-2757
Lindsey JonesDivision of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, School of Public Health, University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA.
Katherine C BrewerDivision of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, School of Public Health, University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA.
Elizabeth A WattsInstitute for Health Research and Policy, University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA.
Caryn E PetersonDivision of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, School of Public Health, University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA.
Carol Estwing FerransInstitute for Health Research and Policy, University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA.
Toni Cipriano-SteffensDepartment of Medical Oncology, University of Chicago Medicine, Chicago, IL, USA.
Blase PoliteDepartment of Medical Oncology, University of Chicago Medicine, Chicago, IL, USA.
Ajay V MakerDepartment of Surgery, Division of Surgical Oncology, University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA.
Rozina ChowdheryDivision of Hematology/Oncology, College of Medicine, University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA.
Yamilé MolinaCenter for Research on Women and Gender, College of Medicine, University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA.
Garth H RauscherDivision of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, School of Public Health, University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA.

Funding

Pilot Program CoreP30ES027792 · NIEHS · UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO · PI Gokhan M. Mutlu, Gail S Prins · 2017 to 2026
$13.6M
Research Training Education CoreP60MD003424 · NIMHD · UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS AT CHICAGO · PI WARNECKE, RICHARD · 2009 to 2013
$9.2M
Stimulating Lymphocyte Activation Combined with Inhibition of Immunosuppressive Signals in Colon Cancer MetastasesR37CA238435 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS AT CHICAGO · PI Ajay V. Maker · 2020 to 2026
$2.5M
Empowering Latinas to Obtain Breast Cancer ScreeningsK01CA193918 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS AT CHICAGO · PI MOLINA, YAMILE · 2016 to 2020
$729k
NCI NIH HHS K01 CA193918NCI NIH HHS R37 CA238435NIEHS NIH HHS P30 ES027792NIMHD NIH HHS P60 MD003424NIMHD NIH HHS P60MD003424
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to first characterize the prevalence of recall, recognition, and knowledge of colon cancer screening tests and guidelines (collectively, "awareness") among non-Hispanic black (NHB) and NH white (NHW) urban colon cancer patients. Second, we sought to examine whether awareness was associated with mode of cancer detection. Low awareness regarding colon cancer screening tests and guidelines may explain low screening rates and high prevalence of symptomatic detection. We examined recall, recognition, and knowledge of colorectal cancer (CRC) screening tests and guidelines and their associations with mode of cancer detection (symptomatic versus screen-detected) in 374 newly diagnosed NHB and NHW patients aged 45-79. Patients were asked to name or describe any test to screen for colon cancer (recall); next, they were given descriptions of stool testing and colonoscopy and asked if they recognized each test (recognition). Lastly, patients were asked if they knew the screening guidelines (knowledge). Overall, awareness of CRC screening guidelines was low; just 20% and 13% of patients knew colonoscopy and fecal test guidelines, respectively. Awareness of CRC screening tests and guidelines was especially low among NHB males, socioeconomically disadvantaged individuals, and those diagnosed at public healthcare facilities. Inability to name or recall a single test was associated with reduced screen-detected cancer compared with recall of at least one test (36% vs. 22%, p = 0.01). Low awareness of CRC screening tests is a risk factor for symptomatic detection of colon cancer.

Indexed as

Colonic NeoplasmsColorectal NeoplasmsColonoscopyEarly Detection of CancerFemaleHumansMaleMass ScreeningOccult BloodSex FactorsAwarenessColon cancerGenderRacial disparitiesScreening

Identifiers

PMID31838729
PMCPMC7293559

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.