Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31838679›Full record

ArticleEnvironmental science and pollution research international2020

Human exposure of bisphenol A and its analogues: understandings from human urinary excretion data and wastewater-based epidemiology.

Hao Wang, Ze-Hua Liu, Jun Zhang, Ri-Ping Huang, Hua Yin, Zhi Dang

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Environmental science and pollution research international, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed
6.7field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed, 116 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Hao WangSchool of Environment and Energy, South China University of Technology, Guangzhou, 510006, Guangdong, China.
Ze-Hua LiuSchool of Environment and Energy, South China University of Technology, Guangzhou, 510006, Guangdong, China. zehualiu@scut.edu.cn.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3293-5356
Jun ZhangSchool of Environment and Energy, South China University of Technology, Guangzhou, 510006, Guangdong, China.
Ri-Ping HuangSchool of Environment and Energy, South China University of Technology, Guangzhou, 510006, Guangdong, China.
Hua YinSchool of Environment and Energy, South China University of Technology, Guangzhou, 510006, Guangdong, China.
Zhi DangSchool of Environment and Energy, South China University of Technology, Guangzhou, 510006, Guangdong, China.
South China University of Technology · CNGuangdong University of Technology · CN

Funding

National Natural Science Foundation of China No. 21107025; No.21577040; U1501234; No.41330639
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This work evaluated human exposure to bisphenol A (BPA) and its analogues based on human urinary excretion data and wastewater-based epidemiology (WBE). The results showed that the world's average human daily intake ranked from high to low is in order of bisphenol A (BPA), bisphenol F (BPF), bisphenol S (BPS), bisphenol P (BPP), bisphenol AP (BPAP), bisphenol B (BPB), bisphenol Z (BPZ), and bisphenol AF (BPAF), and their corresponding human daily intakes are 2.53, 0.68, 0.60, 0.41, 0.36, 0.29, 0.24, and 0.06 μg/p/day, respectively. BPA is clearly the dominant bisphenol for human exposure. However, the results also showed that humans have been widely exposed to BPA analogues as well. Many BPA analogues showed similar estrogenic activities to those of BPA; therefore, the adverse effects of BPA and its analogues on humans should be comprehensively evaluated. The nominal exposure levels obtained based on wastewater-based epidemiology ranked high to low are in order of BPA (513.73 μg/p/day), BPF (10.20 μg/p/day), BPS (5.21 μg/p/day), BPP (1.15 μg/p/day), BPZ (0.66 μg/p/day), BPB (0.61 μg/p/day), BPAF (0.58 μg/p/day), and BPAP (0.35 μg/p/day). The world's human average daily intakes of BPA and its analogues are only 0.5-47.9% of the intakes of their corresponding human nominal exposures. This study suggests that other sources rather human excretions are important origins in municipal wastewater, which indicates that the WBE method based on parent compounds is inappropriate for evaluations of human daily intakes of BPA and its analogues, neither for other industrial compounds that have multiple important sources. Three main important sources of BPA and its analogues in municipal wastewater are likely effluents of industrial wastewater, discharges of hospital wastewater, and landfill leachates. To decrease discharges of BPA and its analogues to the natural environment, any mixing of industrial and hospital wastewater as well as landfill leachates in municipal wastewater is not favorable.

Indexed as

Wastewater-Based Epidemiological MonitoringWater Pollutants, ChemicalBenzhydryl CompoundsBisphenol A CompoundsEnvironmental PollutantsEstroneHumansPhenolsWastewaterBenzhydryl Compoundsbisphenol ABisphenol A CompoundsEnvironmental PollutantsEstronePhenolsWastewaterWater Pollutants, ChemicalBPA analoguesHuman daily intakeHuman nominal exposureMunicipal wastewaterUrineWastewater-based epidemiology

Identifiers

PMID31838679
OpenAlexW2996507199

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.