ArticleInflammation2020
Electrostatic Surface Potential of Macrophages Correlates with Their Functional Phenotype.
Article in Inflammation, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- A synthetic bioactive peptide of the C-terminal fragment of adhesion protein Fibulin7 attenuates the inflammatory functions of innate immune cells in LPS-induced systemic inflammation.Inflammation research : official journal of the European Histamine Research Society ... [et al.] · 2024Article
- Electroactive Biomaterials for Facilitating Bone Defect Repair under Pathological Conditions.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2023Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Macrophages exist in various functional phenotypes, which could be identified by specific surface molecules. Previous studies have shown that modulation of surface charges could alter the phagocytic function of macrophages. In this study, we show that activation of both human peripheral blood monocyte and THP-1-derived macrophages with lipopolysaccharide (LPS) or IL-1β resulted in a significant decrease in the zeta potential compared to freshly isolated monocytes and unstimulated macrophages. Interestingly, interaction with bacteria significantly increased the zeta potential of such cells irrespective of activation conditions. Similarly, IFNγ-treated pro-inflammatory macrophages showed lesser negative zeta potential compared to untreated control. A moderate reduction was also seen in IL-4-treated anti-inflammatory subtype. Additionally, in an LPS-induced systemic inflammation model, bone marrow cells isolated after 2 h of LPS injection showed significant reduction in zeta potential compared to naïve cells. Furthermore, electrostatic potential measurement of surface proteins associated with pro-inflammatory and anti-inflammatory macrophages, using in silico modeling under physiological and protonation conditions, showed that the average electrostatic potential of pro-inflammatory type surface proteins was less negative than anti-inflammatory subtype. These data suggest that the expression of different protein molecules on macrophages under different environments may contribute to the zeta potential and that this quick and low-cost technique could be used in monitoring macrophage functional phenotypes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
31838662What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.