Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31838581›Full record

ArticleEuropean journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging2020

PRRT neuroendocrine tumor response monitored using circulating transcript analysis: the NETest.

Lisa Bodei, Mark S Kidd, Aviral Singh, Wouter A van der Zwan, Stefano Severi, Ignat A Drozdov, Anna Malczewska, Richard P Baum, Dik J Kwekkeboom, Giovanni Paganelli and 2 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 60 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
60citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

60 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. PredictingEuropean journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging · 2026
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Multicycle Dosimetric Behavior and Dose-Effect Relationships in [Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine · 2025
    Article
  8. Review
  9. Interim PET/CT with [European radiology · 2025
    Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Models using comprehensive, lesion-level, longitudinal [European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging · 2024
    Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Absorbed Dose-Response Relationship in Patients with Gastroenteropancreatic Neuroendocrine Tumors Treated with [Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine · 2024
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Lisa BodeiMolecular Imaging and Therapy Service, Department of Radiology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, 1275 York Avenue, Box 77, New York, NY, 10065, USA. bodeil@mskcc.org.ORCID 0000-0001-6930-7383
Mark S KiddWren Laboratories, Branford, CT, USA.
Aviral SinghTheranostics Center for Molecular Radiotherapy and Imaging, Zentralklinik Bad Berka, Bad Berka, Germany.
Wouter A van der ZwanDepartment of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Erasmus Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Stefano SeveriNuclear Medicine and Radiometabolic Units, Istituto Scientifico Romagnolo per lo Studio e la Cura dei Tumori (IRST) IRCCS, Meldola, Italy.
Ignat A DrozdovWren Laboratories, Branford, CT, USA.
Anna MalczewskaDepartment of Endocrinology and Neuroendocrine Tumors, Medical University of Silesia, Katowice, Poland.
Richard P BaumLuGenIum Consortium, Milan, Rotterdam, London, Bad Berka, 54 Portland Place, London, W1B1DY, UK.
Dik J KwekkeboomLuGenIum Consortium, Milan, Rotterdam, London, Bad Berka, 54 Portland Place, London, W1B1DY, UK.
Giovanni PaganelliNuclear Medicine and Radiometabolic Units, Istituto Scientifico Romagnolo per lo Studio e la Cura dei Tumori (IRST) IRCCS, Meldola, Italy.
Eric P KrenningLuGenIum Consortium, Milan, Rotterdam, London, Bad Berka, 54 Portland Place, London, W1B1DY, UK.
Irvin M ModlinLuGenIum Consortium, Milan, Rotterdam, London, Bad Berka, 54 Portland Place, London, W1B1DY, UK.

Funding

X-RAY CRYSTALLOGRAPHYP30CA008748 · NCI · SLOAN-KETTERING INSTITUTE FOR CANCER RES · PI Hongbiao Carl Lekaye · 1985 to 2026
$347.4M
NCI NIH HHS P30 CA008748
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposePeptide receptor radionuclide therapy (PRRT) is effective for metastatic/inoperable neuroendocrine tumors (NETs). Imaging response assessment is usually efficient subsequent to treatment completion. Blood biomarkers such as PRRT Predictive Quotient (PPQ) and NETest are effective in real-time. PPQ predicts PRRT efficacy; NETest monitors disease. We prospectively evaluated: (1) NETest as a surrogate biomarker for RECIST; (2) the correlation of NETest levels with PPQ prediction.

methodsThree independent

resultsOne hundred twenty-two of the 157 were evaluable. RECIST stabilization or response in 67%; 33% progressed. NETest significantly (p < 0.0001) decreased in RECIST "responders" (- 47 ± 3%); in "non-responders," it remained increased (+ 79 ± 19%) (p < 0.0005). NETest monitoring accuracy was 98% (119/122). Follow-up levels > 40 (progressive) vs stable (< 40) significantly correlated with mPFS (not reached vs. 10 months; HR 0.04 (95%CI, 0.02-0.07). PPQ response prediction was accurate in 118 (97%) with a 99% accurate positive and 93% accurate negative prediction. NETest significantly (p < 0.0001) decreased in PPQ-predicted responders (- 46 ± 3%) and remained elevated or increased in PPQ-predicted non-responders (+ 75 ± 19%). Follow-up NETest categories stable vs progressive significantly correlated with PPQ prediction and mPFS (not reached vs. 10 months; HR 0.06 (95%CI, 0.03-0.12). CgA did not reflect PRRT treatment: in RECIST responders decrease in 38% and in non-responders 56% (p = NS).

conclusionsPPQ predicts PRRT response in 97%. NETest accurately monitors PRRT response and is an effective surrogate marker of PRRT radiological response. NETest decrease identified responders and correlated (> 97%) with the pretreatment PPQ response predictor. CgA was non-informative.

Indexed as

Neuroendocrine TumorsPancreatic NeoplasmsBiomarkers, TumorHumansItalyNetherlandsBiomarkers, TumorBiomarkerLiquid biopsyNETestNeuroendocrinePPQPRRT

Identifiers

PMID31838581
PMCPMC7515632

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.