Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31838579›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of colorectal disease2020

High-grade intratumoral tumor budding is a predictor for lymphovascular invasion and adverse outcome in stage II colorectal cancer.

Andreas H Marx, Claudius Mickler, Guido Sauter, Ronald Simon, Luigi M Terracciano, Jakob R Izbicki, Till S Clauditz

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of colorectal disease, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. PERITUMORAL BUDDING AS A PREDICTOR FOR LYMPH NODE METASTASES IN COLORECTAL CARCINOMAS: WHAT IS THE IMPORTANCE?Arquivos brasileiros de cirurgia digestiva : ABCD = Brazilian archives of digestive surgery · 2025
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Andreas H MarxInstitute of Pathology, Klinikum Fuerth, Jakob-Henle-Str. 1, 90766, Fuerth, Germany. andreas.marx@klinikum-fuerth.de.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5182-8364
Claudius MicklerInstitute of Pathology, Klinikum Fuerth, Jakob-Henle-Str. 1, 90766, Fuerth, Germany.
Guido SauterInstitute of Pathology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, 20246, Hamburg, Germany.
Ronald SimonInstitute of Pathology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, 20246, Hamburg, Germany.
Luigi M TerraccianoInstitute of Pathology, University Hospital Basel, 4001, Basel, Switzerland.
Jakob R IzbickiDepartment of Surgery, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, 20246, Hamburg, Germany.
Till S ClauditzInstitute of Pathology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, 20246, Hamburg, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeEvaluation of tumor budding in colorectal cancer (CRC) may help to predict the tumors' metastatic potential and patients with an aggressive tumor, although not yet metastasized at time of surgery might benefit from adjuvant therapy.

methodsThe degree of intratumoral tumor budding (ITB) was classified as low, intermediate, and high grade according to the recommendations of the International Tumor Budding Consensus Conference (ITBCC) 2016 on H&E and pankeratin-stained TMA sections from 1262 CRC, no special type (NST), including 655 stage II CRC and was correlated to clinicopathological data and overall survival.

resultsResults show that higher ITB rates are significantly linked to higher tumor grade and stage, positive nodal status, lymphovascular invasion (P < 0.0001 each), absence of peritumoral lymphocytes, infiltrating type invasive tumor margin, left-sided cancer localization, and mismatch-repair proficient cancers (P < 0.05 each). In a cohort of 655 stage II CRC, ITB was associated with lymphovascular invasion (P = 0.0459) and adverse clinical outcome (P < 0.0001). In a multivariate analysis including tumor stage, tumor grade, lymphovascular invasion, ITB, and tumor localization, only low tumor stage (P = 0.0022) and absence of lymphovascular invasion (P = 0.0043) showed independent prognostic significance.

conclusionIn conclusion, our findings argue towards a clinical utility of ITB as a prognostic biomarker in stage II colorectal cancer to define patients who might benefit from adjuvant therapy. ITB might be used as additional or surrogate marker in CRC in which peritumoral tumor budding is difficult to assess.

Indexed as

Cell MovementAgedBlood VesselsColorectal NeoplasmsFemaleHumansLymphatic MetastasisLymphatic VesselsMaleNeoplasm GradingNeoplasm InvasivenessNeoplasm StagingPredictive Value of TestsRetrospective StudiesRisk FactorsTreatment OutcomeColorectal cancerIntratumoral tumor buddingPrognosisTMA

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.