Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31838575›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of public health2020

Barriers to cervical cancer screening in Guatemala: a quantitative analysis using data from the Guatemala Demographic and Health Surveys.

Anna Gottschlich, Pamela Ochoa, Alvaro Rivera-Andrade, Christian S Alvarez, Carlos Mendoza Montano, Claudia Camel, Rafael Meza

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of public health, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Low Levels of Lifetime Pap Test Receipt Among Vulnerable Guatemalans.Journal of cancer education : the official journal of the American Association for Cancer Education · 2024
    Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Anna GottschlichDepartment of Epidemiology, School of Public Health, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.
Pamela OchoaPRA Health Sciences, Guatemala City, Guatemala.
Alvaro Rivera-AndradeResearch Center for the Prevention of Chronic Diseases, Institute of Nutrition of Central America and Panama-INCAP, Guatemala City, Guatemala.
Christian S AlvarezDepartment of Epidemiology, School of Public Health, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.
Carlos Mendoza MontanoResearch Center for the Prevention of Chronic Diseases, Institute of Nutrition of Central America and Panama-INCAP, Guatemala City, Guatemala.
Claudia CamelGuatemala Ministry of Health and Social Assistance (MSPAS), Guatemala City, Guatemala.
Rafael MezaDepartment of Epidemiology, School of Public Health, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA. rmeza@umich.edu.

Funding

XenograftP30CA046592 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI THEODORE S LAWRENCE · 1988 to 2026
$178.2M
Biostatistics Training Program in Cancer ResearchT32CA083654 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI Veerabhadran Baladandayuthapani, Kelley McLain Kidwell · 2002 to 2026
$4.3M
NCI NIH HHS P30 CA046592NCI NIH HHS P30CA046592NCI NIH HHS T32 CA083654NCI NIH HHS T32CA083654
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesExamine the association between commonly reported barriers to health care, including discordant spoken languages between patients and providers, and reported previous cervical cancer screening.

methodsData from the nationally representative Guatemala National Maternal and Child Health Survey from the Demographic and Health Surveys Program were used to explore associations between barriers and screening rates nationwide and in high-risk populations, such as rural and indigenous communities. Negative binomial regressions were run accounting for survey sample weights to calculate prevalence ratios.

results64.0%, 57.5% and 47.5% of women reported ever screening, in the overall, indigenous, and rural populations, respectively. Overall, never screened for cervical cancer was associated with the following health barriers: needing permission, cost, distance, not wanting to go alone, and primary language not spoken by health providers, even after adjustment for age, ethnicity, and literacy.

conclusionsOffering screening programs alone is not enough to reduce the burden of cervical cancer in Guatemala. Measures need to be taken to reduce barriers to health care, particularly in rural areas, where screening rates are lowest.

Indexed as

Early Detection of CancerMass ScreeningPatient Acceptance of Health CareAdultDemographyFemaleGuatemalaHealth SurveysHumansMiddle AgedRural PopulationUterine Cervical NeoplasmsCervical cancerHealthcare barriersIndigenous communitiesScreening

Identifiers

PMID31838575
PMCPMC7049547

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.