Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31838528›Full record

ReviewNeurosurgery2020

Mechanism of Action and Biology of Flow Diverters in the Treatment of Intracranial Aneurysms.

Krishnan Ravindran, Amanda M Casabella, Juan Cebral, Waleed Brinjikji, David F Kallmes, Ram Kadirvel

Open access · greenAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Neurosurgery, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 86 papers, 9 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
86citing papers in PubMed, 9 pooled it
6.4field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

86 citing papers in PubMed, 9 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 139 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Endovascular biopsy in neurointerventional surgery: A systematic review.Interventional neuroradiology : journal of peritherapeutic neuroradiology, surgical procedures and related neurosciences · 2026
    Pooled it
  2. Comparative meta-analysis of endovascular strategies for intracranial dissecting aneurysms: Flow diverters versus stents with or without coiling.Interventional neuroradiology : journal of peritherapeutic neuroradiology, surgical procedures and related neurosciences · 2026
    Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Treatment of ruptured intracranial aneurysms using the novel generation of flow-diverters with surface modification: A systematic review and meta-analysis.Interventional neuroradiology : journal of peritherapeutic neuroradiology, surgical procedures and related neurosciences · 2024
    Pooled it
  6. Patient outcomes after treatment of brain aneurysm in small diameter vessels with the silk vista baby flow diverter: A systematic review.Interventional neuroradiology : journal of peritherapeutic neuroradiology, surgical procedures and related neurosciences · 2024
    Pooled it
  7. Pooled it
  8. Treatment of carotid cavernous sinus fistulas with flow diverters. A case report and systematic review.Interventional neuroradiology : journal of peritherapeutic neuroradiology, surgical procedures and related neurosciences · 2022
    Pooled it
  9. Pooled it
  10. Trial
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Flow diverter surface modifications for aneurysm treatment: A review of the mechanisms and data behind existing technologies.Interventional neuroradiology : journal of peritherapeutic neuroradiology, surgical procedures and related neurosciences · 2026
    Review

26 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Krishnan RavindranDepartment of Radiology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota.
Amanda M CasabellaDepartment of Radiology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota.
Juan CebralBioengineering Department, George Mason University, Fairfax, Virginia.
Waleed BrinjikjiDepartment of Radiology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota.
David F KallmesDepartment of Radiology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota.
Ram KadirvelDepartment of Radiology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota.
Mayo Clinic · USGeorge Mason University · US

Funding

TRAINING GRANT IN CLINICAL PHARMACOLOGYT32GM008685 · NIGMS · MAYO CLINIC ROCHESTER · PI Liewei Wang · 1998 to 2026
$8.2M
Computational and Biological Approach to Flow DiversionR01NS076491 · NINDS · MAYO CLINIC ROCHESTER · PI Juan R Cebral, DAVID F KALLMES · 2011 to 2026
$7.4M
NIGMS NIH HHS T32 GM008685NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS076491
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Flow diverters have drastically changed the landscape of intracranial aneurysm treatment and are now considered first-line therapy for select lesions. Their mechanism of action relies on intrinsic alteration in hemodynamic parameters, both at the parent artery and within the aneurysm sac. Moreover, the device struts act as a nidus for endothelial cell growth across the aneurysm neck ultimately leading to aneurysm exclusion from the circulation. In silico computational analyses and investigations in preclinical animal models have provided valuable insights into the underlying biological basis for flow diverter therapy. Here, we review the present understanding pertaining to flow diverter biology and mechanisms of action, focusing on stent design, induction of intra-aneurysmal thrombosis, endothelialization, and alterations in hemodynamics.

Indexed as

Blood Vessel ProsthesisAnimalsEmbolization, TherapeuticEndovascular ProceduresHemodynamicsHumansIntracranial AneurysmEndothelializationEndovascularHealingPipeline embolization deviceThrombosis

Identifiers

PMID31838528
PMCPMC6911734
OpenAlexW2996410020

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.