Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31838301›Full record

ReviewThe Science of the total environment2020

Health effects from freshly emitted versus oxidatively or photochemically aged air pollutants.

Chelsea A Weitekamp, Tina Stevens, Michael J Stewart, Prakash Bhave, M Ian Gilmour

Open access · greenAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in The Science of the total environment, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed
3.1field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 72 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Complex urban atmosphere alters alveolar stem cells niche properties and drives lung fibrosis.American journal of physiology. Lung cellular and molecular physiology · 2023
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Toxicological Effects of Secondary Air Pollutants.Chemical research in Chinese universities · 2023
    Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Evaluation of small form factor, filter-based PMAtmospheric environment (Oxford, England : 1994) · 2021
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Air pollution and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.Chronic diseases and translational medicine · 2020
    Review
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 2 countries.

Chelsea A WeitekampCenter for Public Health and Environmental Assessment, United States Environmental Protection Agency, Research Triangle Park, NC 27711, USA.
Tina StevensCenter for Public Health and Environmental Assessment, United States Environmental Protection Agency, Research Triangle Park, NC 27711, USA.
Michael J StewartCenter for Public Health and Environmental Assessment, United States Environmental Protection Agency, Research Triangle Park, NC 27711, USA.
Prakash BhaveCenter for Public Health and Environmental Assessment, United States Environmental Protection Agency, Research Triangle Park, NC 27711, USA.
M Ian GilmourCenter for Public Health and Environmental Assessment, United States Environmental Protection Agency, Research Triangle Park, NC 27711, USA. Electronic address: gilmour.ian@epa.gov.
Environmental Protection Agency · US

Funding

Intramural EPA EPA999999
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Epidemiology studies over the past five decades have provided convincing evidence that exposure to air pollution is associated with multiple adverse health outcomes, including increased mortality. Air pollution is a complex mixture of particles, vapors and gases emitted from natural and anthropogenic sources as well as formed through photochemical transformation processes. In metropolitan areas, air pollutants from combustion emissions feature a blend of emitted particles, oxides of carbon, sulfur and nitrogen, volatile organic compounds, and secondary reaction products, such as ozone, nitrogen dioxide, and secondary organic aerosols. Because many of the primary and transformed pollutants track together, their relative contributions to health outcomes are difficult to disentangle. Aside from the criteria pollutants ozone and nitrogen dioxide and some of the simpler aldehydes (e.g. formaldehyde and acrolein), other products from photochemical processes are a particularly vexing class of chemicals to investigate since they comprise a dynamic ill-defined complex mixture in both particulate and gas phases. The purpose of this review was to describe and compare health effects of freshly emitted versus oxidatively or photochemically aged air pollutants. In some cases, (e.g. single volatile organic compounds) photochemical transformation resulted in marked enhancements in toxicity through formation of both known and unidentified reaction products, while in other examples (e.g. aging of automobile emissions) the potentiation of effect was variable. The variation in experimental design, aging system employed, concentration and type of starting agent, and toxicity endpoints make comparisons between different studies exceedingly difficult. A more systematic approach with a greater emphasis on higher throughput screening and computational toxicology is needed to fully answer under what conditions oxidatively- or photochemically-transformed pollutants elicit greater health effects than primary emissions.

Indexed as

Air PollutantsAir PollutionAldehydesEnvironmental ExposureHumansNitrogen DioxideOzoneParticulate MatterVolatile Organic CompoundsAir PollutantsAldehydesNitrogen DioxideOzoneParticulate MatterVolatile Organic CompoundsAir pollutionComparisonHealth effectsMixturesPhotochemistryToxicology

Identifiers

PMID31838301
PMCPMC9186024
OpenAlexW2994388855

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.