Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31838293›Full record

ReviewCurrent opinion in structural biology2020

INO80 and SWR1 complexes: the non-identical twins of chromatin remodelling.

Oliver Willhoft, Dale B Wigley

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Current opinion in structural biology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 49 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
49citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

49 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Mechanistic insights into INO80-type chromatin remodelers.Current opinion in structural biology · 2025
    Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Oliver WillhoftSection of Structural and Synthetic Biology, Dept. Infectious Disease, Faculty of Medicine, Imperial College London, London SW7 2AZ, UK.
Dale B WigleySection of Structural and Synthetic Biology, Dept. Infectious Disease, Faculty of Medicine, Imperial College London, London SW7 2AZ, UK. Electronic address: D.Wigley@imperial.ac.uk.

Funding

Cancer Research UK 12799Cancer Research UK C6913/A21608Medical Research Council MR/R009023/1Wellcome Trust 209327/Z/17/Z
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The INO80 family of chromatin remodellers are multisubunit complexes that perform a variety of tasks on nucleosomes. Family members are built around a heterohexamer of RuvB-like protein, an ATP-dependent DNA translocase,nuclear actin and actin-related proteins, and a few complex-specific subunits. They modify chromatin in a number of ways including nucleosome sliding and exchange of variant histones. Recent structural information on INO80 and SWR1 complexes has revealed similarities in the basic architecture of the complexes. However, structural and biochemical data on the complexes bound to nucleosomes reveal these similarities to be somewhat superficial and their biochemical activities and mechanisms are very different. Consequently, the INO80 family displays a surprising diversity of function that is based upon a similar structural framework.

Indexed as

Chromatin Assembly and DisassemblyAdenosine TriphosphatasesAmino Acid SequenceATPases Associated with Diverse Cellular ActivitiesBinding SitesChromatinDNA-Binding ProteinsFungal ProteinsGene Expression RegulationHumansMolecular Docking SimulationMolecular Dynamics SimulationMultiprotein ComplexesNucleosomesProtein BindingProtein ConformationAdenosine TriphosphatasesATPases Associated with Diverse Cellular ActivitiesChromatinDNA-Binding ProteinsFungal ProteinsINO80 protein, humanMultiprotein ComplexesNucleosomes

Identifiers

PMID31838293
PMCPMC7171469

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.